A 400 Kg truck rushing through the street at 20 m/s crashes into a 50 Kg car moving in the same direction at 2 m/s. after the collision the car moves at 142 m/s, what is the final velocity of the truck?

Its momentum in the unit of GeV/c is 5 GeV/c and its speed is 2.997 x 10⁸ m/s

The total energy of a nuclear particle is the sum of its rest energy and kinetic energy.

In this case, the total energy is 15 GeV.

The momentum of the particle can be calculated using the formula p = E/c, where E is the total energy and c is the speed of light (approximately 3 x 10⁸ m/s).

Converting 15 GeV to joules and plugging into the formula gives a momentum of approximately 5.02 x 10⁻²¹ kg m/s or 5 GeV/c.

The speed of the particle can be calculated using the formula v = p/sqrt(m² + p²), where m is the rest mass of the particle.

Since the rest energy of the particle is given, we can use the formula E = mc^2 to calculate its rest mass.

Converting 5 GeV to joules and dividing by c² gives a rest mass of approximately 8.97 x 10⁻²⁸kg.

Plugging in the values for momentum and rest mass gives a speed of approximately 0.9999999999985c or 2.997 x 10⁸ m/s (very close to the speed of light).

Learn more about kinetic energy at

https://brainly.com/question/31481186

#SPJ11

If interstellar dust makes an rr Lyrae then the distance to the rr Lyrae variable star by a factor of 10, and its true distance will be 100 parsecs.

If interstellar dust makes an rr Lyrae variable star look 5 magnitudes fainter than it should, then we can use the magnitude-distance formula to determine how much we will over- or underestimate its distance. The magnitude-distance formula is:

m - M = 5log(d/10)
where m is the apparent magnitude of the star, M is its absolute magnitude, and d is its distance in parsecs.

If the star looks 5 magnitudes fainter than it should, then we can write:
m - M = 5 + 5log(d/10)

Since we are underestimating the distance, we can assume that the distance we calculate using this formula will be smaller than the actual distance. Therefore, we need to solve for d when the left-hand side of the equation is 5 magnitudes greater than it should be. In other words:
m - M = 10

Substituting this into the formula, we get:

10 = 5 + 5log(d/10)
5 = 5log(d/10)
1 = log(d/10)
d/10 = 10
d = 100 parsecs

Therefore, we will underestimate the distance to the rr lyrae variable star by a factor of 10, and its true distance will be 100 parsecs.

If you need to learn more about Interstellar click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12497791

#SPJ11

There is no osmotic pressure difference across the cell membrane. This means that the concentration of solutes inside the cell is the same as the concentration outside the cell, so water flows in and out of the cell at the same rate.

However, if the cells are placed in pure water at 20°C, there will be a pressure difference across the cell membrane.

This is because the concentration of solutes outside the cell is now lower than inside the cell, so water will flow into the cell, causing it to swell and potentially burst.

The exact pressure difference will depend on the specific characteristics of the cell membrane and the concentration gradient.

Learn more about concentration gradient at

https://brainly.com/question/1386629

#SPJ11

θ = 528.6 rad * 1 rev / (2π rad) = 84.0 rev

The total number of revolutions the engine makes in 2.2 seconds is 84.0 revolutions.

To find the angular acceleration of the engine, we can use the formula:

α = (ωf - ωi) / t

where α is the angular acceleration, ωi is the initial angular velocity, ωf is the final angular velocity, and t is the time interval.

We are given:

ωi = 4600 rpm

ωf = 1200 rpm

t = 2.2 s

Converting the initial and final angular velocities to radians per second:

ωi = 4600 rpm * 2π / 60 = 482.39 rad/s

ωf = 1200 rpm * 2π / 60 = 125.66 rad/s

Substituting the values into the formula:

[tex]α = (125.66 rad/s - 482.39 rad/s) / 2.2 s = -204.8 rad/s^2[/tex]

The negative sign means that the engine is decelerating.

Therefore, the angular acceleration of the engine is[tex]-204.8 rad/s^2.[/tex]

To find the total number of revolutions the engine makes in 2.2 seconds, we can use the formula:

[tex]\theta= \omega_i*t + 1/2 * \alpha * t^2[/tex]

where θ is the angular displacement, ωi is the initial angular velocity, α is the angular acceleration, and t is the time interval.

Since the initial and final angular velocities are in the same direction, we can assume that the engine is rotating in the same direction throughout the deceleration.

Therefore, we can use the formula for constant angular acceleration.

Substituting the values we have:

[tex]\theta= \omega_i*t + 1/2 * \alpha * t^2[/tex]

[tex]\theta = 482.39 rad/s * 2.2 s + 1/2 * (-204.8 rad/s^2) * (2.2 s)^2[/tex]

θ = 528.6 rad

Converting radians to revolutions:

θ = 528.6 rad * 1 rev / (2π rad) = 84.0 rev (rounded to two significant figures)

To know more about angular acceleration refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30238727#

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the average induced emf is 3.0888 V.

for the magnitude of the average induced emf opposing the decrease of the current, we  use the formula:

emf = -L(di/dt)

Where emf is the induced electromotive force, L is the inductance of the inductor, and di/dt is the rate of change of current.

Given that the current through the inductor is 4.75 A and the inductance is 5.5 mH, we can calculate the rate of change of current using the formula:

di/dt = (i - 0) / t

Where i is the initial current, which is 4.75 A, and t is the time it takes for the current to stop flowing, which is 8.47 ms or 0.00847 s.

di/dt = (4.75 A - 0) / 0.00847 s
di/dt = 561.6 A/s

Substituting these values into the formula for emf, we get:

emf = -5.5 mH x 561.6 A/s
emf = -3.0888 V

Therefore, the magnitude of the average induced emf opposing the decrease of the current is 3.0888 V.

To learn more about electromotive force visit: https://brainly.com/question/17082851

#SPJ11

The heat exchange surface area is  0.58 [tex]m^2[/tex]. While the required oil flow rate is 133.1 kg/min.

a) To calculate the heat exchanger surface area, we can use the following equation:

Q = UA ∆Tlm

where Q is the heat transfer rate, U is the overall heat transfer coefficient, A is the heat transfer area, and ∆Tlm is the logarithmic mean temperature difference.

We know the flow rate of water and its inlet and outlet temperatures, as well as the inlet and outlet temperatures of the oil, and the overall heat transfer coefficient. We can calculate the logarithmic mean temperature difference using the formula:

∆Tlm = (∆T1 - ∆T2) / ln(∆T1 / ∆T2)

where ∆T1 is the temperature difference between the hot and cold fluids at one end of the exchanger, and ∆T2 is the temperature difference at the other end.

∆T1 = (120 - 75) = 45°C

∆T2 = (35 - 75) = -40°C

∆Tlm = [(45 - (-40)) / ln(45 / (-40))] = 61.69°C

We can now calculate the heat transfer rate using the formula:

Q = m_water * Cp_water * ∆T

where m_water is the mass flow rate of water, Cp_water is the specific heat of water, and ∆T is the temperature difference between the inlet and outlet water temperatures.

m_water = 68 kg/min

Cp_water = 4.18 kJ/kg °C

∆T = (75 - 35) = 40°C

Q = (68 * 4.18 * 40) = 11324.8 kJ/min

We can now substitute the values of Q, U, and ∆Tlm in the first equation to obtain the surface area A:

A = Q / (U * ∆Tlm) = (11324.8 / (320 * 61.69)) = 0.58 [tex]m^2[/tex]

b) To find the required oil flow rate, we can use the following equation:

Q = m_oil * Cp_oil * ∆T

where m_oil is the mass flow rate of oil, Cp_oil is the specific heat of oil, and ∆T is the temperature difference between the inlet and outlet oil temperatures.

We know Q from the previous calculation, and we can calculate ∆T as:

∆T = (120 - 75) = 45°C

Substituting the values of Q, Cp_oil, and ∆T, we obtain:

m_oil = Q / (Cp_oil * ∆T) = (11324.8 / (1.9 * 45)) = 133.1 kg/min

Therefore, the required oil flow rate is 133.1 kg/min.

To learn more about heat exchange refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22595817

#SPJ11

The peak wavelength of a blackbody curve for the brightest main sequence star would be 966 nm.

What is  Blackbody radiation?

The peak wavelength of a blackbody curve is determined by the temperature of the object emitting the radiation, according to Wien's law. Therefore, the peak wavelength of a blackbody curve for the brightest main sequence star will depend on the temperature of that star.

The temperature of the brightest main sequence star varies depending on the star, but it is generally around 30,000 Kelvin. Using Wien's law (λ_max = b / T), where b is Wien's displacement constant, we can calculate the peak wavelength of a blackbody curve for a star at this temperature.

Substituting b = 2.898 × 10-³ m·K and T = 30,000 K, we get:

λ_max = 2.898 × 10-³ m·K / 30,000 K

λ_max ≈ 9.66 × 10-⁸ m

Converting this wavelength to nanometers, we get:

λ_max ≈ 966 nm

Therefore, the peak wavelength of a blackbody curve for the brightest main sequence star would be approximately 966 nm. None of the options provided match this result, so the correct answer is not given.

To know more about  Blackbody radiation visiit:

https://brainly.com/question/14202586

#SPJ4

The magnitude of the point charge is approximately 2.7 x 10⁻⁸ coulombs.

We can use Coulomb's law to solve for the magnitude of the point charge. Coulomb's law states that the electric field, E, at a distance r from a point charge, q, is given by: E = k * (q / r²)

where k is Coulomb's constant, which is approximately equal to 8.99 x 10⁹ N * m² / C².

In this case, we are given the electric field magnitude, E = 2.3 n/C, and the distance from the point charge, r = 56 cm = 0.56 m. We can rearrange Coulomb's law to solve for the magnitude of the point charge, q: q = E * r² / k

Substituting the given values, we get: q = (2.3 n/C) * (0.56 m)² / (8.99 x 10⁹ N * m² / C²)

q = 2.7 x 10⁻⁸ C

Therefore, the magnitude of the point charge is approximately 2.7 x 10⁻⁸ coulombs.

Know more about Coulomb's law here

https://brainly.com/question/506926#

#SPJ11

The focal length of the eyepiece in the sea-going pirate's telescope is 2.3 cm.

the focal length of the eyepiece as f_e and the focal length of the objective lens as f_o. In this case, f_o = 26.7 cm.

The telescope's magnification (M) can be calculated using the formula:

M = f_o / f_e

the total length of the telescope (L) is the sum of the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece lenses:

L = f_o + f_e

29 cm = 26.7 cm + f_e

the focal length of the eyepiece (f_e), we need to solve for f_e

f_e = 29 cm - 26.7 cm
f_e = 2.3 cm

So, the focal length of the eyepiece in the sea-going pirate's telescope is 2.3 cm.

Learn more about focal length

brainly.com/question/29870264

#SPJ11

An astronaut travels to a distant star with a speed of 0.56 c relative to Earth and from the astronaut's point of view, the star is 7.6 ly from Earth. On the return trip, the astronaut travels with a speed of 0.88 c relative to Earth.

To explain, "c" represents the speed of light and is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. The distance between two objects is measured in light-years (L) which is the distance that light travels in a year.

In this scenario, the astronaut is traveling at 0.56 times the speed of light, which is incredibly fast. From their point of view, the star is 7.6 light-years away from Earth. On the return trip, they travel even faster at 0.88 times the speed of light relative to Earth.

It's important to note that time dilation occurs at these speeds, meaning that time will appear to move slower for the astronaut than it does for people on Earth. This is due to the theory of relativity and the fact that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and time slows down.

To know more about speed of light refer to

https://brainly.com/question/29216893

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the net charge stored on each plate is 0.015 C.

To find the net charge stored on each plate of a capacitor, we can use the formula Q = CV, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage across the capacitor. In this case, the capacitance is given as 15-1F, which means 15 x 10^-1 F or 1.5 F. The voltage across the capacitor is given as 30 V. Substituting these values into the formula gives Q = (1.5 F)(30 V) = 45 C. This is the total charge on both plates of the capacitor.

Since the charge is negative on one plate and positive on the other, we only care about the magnitude of the charge. To find the magnitude of the net charge stored on each plate, we divide the total charge by two. Therefore, the magnitude of the net charge on each plate is 22.5 C.

Finally, we round this answer to three significant figures, since both the capacitance and voltage were given to only two significant figures. Rounding gives a magnitude of 0.015 C. The appropriate unit is coulombs (C).

To learn more about capacitor visit:

brainly.com/question/17176550

#SPJ11

(a) Rest energy of the proton is approximately 938 MeV.

(b) Total energy of the proton is approximately 1.86 GeV.

(c) Kinetic energy of the proton is approximately 0.92 GeV.

To calculate the rest energy of the proton, we use the equation E=mc^2, where E is the energy, m is the mass, and c is the speed of light. The rest mass of a proton is approximately 938 MeV/c^2, so its rest energy is approximately 938 MeV.

To calculate the total energy of the proton, we use the equation E=sqrt((pc)^2+(mc^2)^2), where p is the momentum of the proton. Since we know the speed of the proton, we can calculate its momentum using the equation p=mv/(sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)), where m is the rest mass of the proton. Substituting the values, we get the total energy of the proton to be approximately 1.86 GeV.

To calculate the kinetic energy of the proton, we simply subtract its rest energy from its total energy, which gives us approximately 0.92 GeV.

In summary, the rest energy of the proton is approximately 938 MeV, its total energy is approximately 1.86 GeV, and its kinetic energy is approximately 0.92 GeV.

Learn more about calculate here :

https://brainly.com/question/30151794

#SPJ11

To find the angular velocity of the car, we need to first convert the speed from miles per hour to inches per minute. 39 mph = 57,120 inches per minute. Next, we need to find the circumference of the tire using the diameter given. Circumference = π x diameter
Circumference = 3.14 x 28 inches
Circumference = 87.92 inches

Now we can find the number of revolutions per minute by dividing the distance traveled per minute by the distance traveled in one revolution.

Revolutions per minute = 57,120 inches per minute / 87.92 inches per revolution
Revolutions per minute = 649.55 revolutions per minute

Finally, we can find the angular velocity by multiplying the number of revolutions per minute by 2π (since there are 2π radians in one revolution).

Angular velocity = 649.55 revolutions per minute x 2π radians per revolution
Angular velocity = 4,083.7 radians per minute

Therefore, the angular velocity of the car is approximately 4,083.7 radians per minute.

To find the angular velocity of a car traveling at 39 mph with tires having a diameter of 28 inches, we will follow these steps:

1. Convert the car's linear velocity (39 mph) to inches per minute.
2. Calculate the tire's circumference.
3. Find the angular velocity.

Step 1: Convert the linear velocity to inches per minute:

Step 2: Calculate the tire's circumference:

Step 3: Find the angular velocity:
Angular velocity (ω) = linear velocity / tire circumference.

To know about Velocity visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11

The hook's mass and volume can contribute to the experimental density, leading to inaccurately high results.

In an experiment measuring the density of an object, it is crucial to account for all factors that might affect the measurement. If a hook is used to suspend the object in a liquid, the hook's mass and volume may be inadvertently included in the calculations. This can lead to an overestimation of the object's actual density.

When calculating density, the formula used is density = mass/volume. If the hook's mass is not subtracted from the total mass measurement, the numerator in this equation will be too high. Similarly, if the hook displaces any of the liquid in the container, the volume measurement might also be affected, potentially increasing the denominator in the density equation. Both of these factors can contribute to an experimental density that is higher than the true value.

To avoid such errors, it is important to properly account for the hook's mass and volume during the experiment. This can be done by measuring the hook's mass separately and subtracting it from the total mass. Additionally, ensuring that the hook does not displace a significant amount of liquid can help prevent errors in volume measurement. By taking these precautions, you can obtain a more accurate experimental density.

To know more about density, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/29775886

#SPJ11

The worker must move approximately 2.0 meters away from the source to reduce the equivalent dose rate by a factor of 4.

For such more questions on worker

https://brainly.com/question/30261802

#SPJ11

The work done on an object is defined as the product of the force exerted on the object and the displacement of the object in the direction of the force. In this case, you are pushing on a wall, but the wall does not move, so there is no displacement in the direction of the force. Therefore, the work done on the wall is zero.

The correct option is D.

It is important to note that work is a measurable quantity that can be calculated using the formula W = F * d * cos(theta), where F is the force applied, d is the displacement, and theta is the angle between the force and the displacement.

In this case, theta is 90 degrees because there is no displacement in the direction of the force, and therefore, cos(theta) is zero, resulting in zero work done.

It is also worth noting that pushing on a wall can still be physically exhausting, even if no work is done on the wall. This is because the energy expended by the muscles in the body is not directly related to the work done on the wall, but rather to the internal processes of the body.

To know more about displacement refer here :-

https://brainly.com/question/29307794#

#SPJ11

The value of the spring constant for the lower spring is 83 N/m.

The equation that relates the force applied to a spring, its displacement, and its spring constant is known as Hooke's law, and it can be written as:

F = -kx

where F is the force applied to the spring, x is the displacement of the spring from its equilibrium position, and k is the spring constant.

In the context of the given problem, we can use this equation to calculate the spring constant for the lower spring when it has been compressed by 2.2 cm and the scale reads 18 N. The calculation involves rearranging the equation as follows:

k = -F/x

Substituting the given values, we get:

k = -18 N / 0.022 m

Simplifying this expression gives:

k = -818.18 N/m

However, since we need to express the answer with two significant figures, we round the answer to:

k = 83 N/m

Thus, the value of the spring constant for the lower spring is 83 N/m.

Learn more about Hooke's law

brainly.com/question/29126957

#SPJ11

Concerning the visible interstellar matter within the Milky Way, the correct statements are b and c. The mean interstellar density outside of nebulae is about one atom per cubic meter, and dark nebulae are caused by dense regions of interstellar particles made of ice and dust particles.

a. Reflection nebulae generally appear bluish in color, not reddish, due to the scattering of light by dust particles. Reddish colors are typically associated with emission nebulae, where ionized gas emits light at specific wavelengths, such as the red Hydrogen-alpha emission line.

d. Interstellar dust "clouds" can appear as reflection or absorption (dark) nebulae but not as emission nebulae. Emission nebulae are regions of ionized gas that emit light, while reflection nebulae are caused by the scattering of light by dust particles, and absorption (dark) nebulae are formed by the obscuration of light due to dense regions of interstellar dust and gas.

To know more about the scattering of light, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/9922540

#SPJ11

In a thundercloud, the bottom of the cloud becomes negatively charged, inducing a positive charge on the ground below and generating an electric field.

The electric field between the ground and a typical thundercloud is about 2000 N/C.

(a) To sketch the electric field between the cloud and the Earth, draw two parallel lines representing the bottom of the cloud and the Earth's surface.

Add arrows pointing from the negatively charged cloud towards the positively charged ground, representing the direction of the electric field.

These arrows should be evenly spaced and perpendicular to both the cloud and the Earth's surface.

(b) To calculate the charge per unit area of the bottom surface of the cloud and the Earth, use the following formula:

σ = ε₀ * E

where σ represents the charge per unit area, ε₀ is the vacuum permittivity (8.854 x 10⁻¹² F/m), and E is the electric field (2000 N/C).

σ = (8.854 x 10⁻¹² F/m) * (2000 N/C)

σ ≈ 1.77 x 10⁻⁸ C/m²

The charge per unit area of the bottom surface of the cloud and the Earth is approximately 1.77 x 10⁻⁸ C/m².

To know more about electric field refer here

https://brainly.com/question/15800304#

#SPJ11

a) It takes 209 seconds for 1.9×10^3C of charge to pass through the hair dryer.

b) 1.9×10³C of charge represents 1.1864×10²² electrons passing through the hair dryer.

a. To find the time it takes for 1.9×10³C of charge to pass through the hair dryer, we can use the equation Q = It, where Q is the charge, I is the current, and t is the time. Rearranging the equation, we get t = Q/I. Plugging in the given values, we get:

t = 1.9×10³C / 9.1A = 208.79 seconds (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, it takes approximately 209 seconds for 1.9×10^3C of charge to pass through the hair dryer.

b. To find the number of electrons that make up 1.9×10³C of charge, we can use the fact that one coulomb of charge is equal to 6.24×10¹⁸ electrons. We can use this conversion factor to find the number of electrons:

1.9×10³C x (6.24×10¹⁸ electrons/C) = 1.1864×10²² electrons

Therefore, 1.9×10³C of charge represents approximately 1.1864×10²² electrons passing through the hair dryer.

Learn more about current here,

https://brainly.com/question/30611906

#SPJ11

The change in resistance (δr) in ohms for a strain gauge with a nominal resistance (r0) of 1000 ω and a gauge factor.

It is important to note that strain gauges are used to measure small changes in strain or deformation. They work on the principle that when a metal conductor is stretched, its resistance increases due to the decrease in cross-sectional area and increase in length.

In engineering applications, strain gauges are commonly used to measure the strain in structural components such as beams, columns, and bridges. The measured strain is then used to calculate the stress in the material using the material's elastic modulus. This helps in designing and testing the strength and durability of the components.

To know more about OHM visit

https://brainly.com/question/29750972

#SPJ11

The work done in one stroke is 96.5 joules and the average force exerted on the piston, neglecting friction and gravitational force, is 86.6 Newtons.

(a) To find the work done in one stroke of the hand-driven tire pump, we need to calculate the volume of air displaced by the piston, which can be found using the formula V = πr^2h, where r is the radius of the piston (which is half the diameter), h is the stroke length, and π is a constant.

So, the volume of air displaced in one stroke is V = π(2.1/2)^2(38) = 469.8 cm^3.

Next, we can calculate the work done using the formula W = Fd, where F is the force exerted on the piston and d is the distance traveled by the piston. Since the force is equal to the gauge pressure multiplied by the area of the piston, we have:

W = (2.6×10^5 N/m^2) × π(2.1/2)^2 × 0.38 m = 96.5 J

(b) To find the average force exerted on the piston, we can rearrange the formula F = PA to solve for F, where P is the gauge pressure and A is the area of the piston. Thus:

F = PA = (2.6×10^5 N/m^2) × π(2.1/2)^2 = 86.6 N

For more such questions on gravitational force:

https://brainly.com/question/12528243

#SPJ11

The work done in one stroke is approximately 34.8 Joules.

The average force exerted on the piston is approximately 89.9 Newtons.

(a) The work done is given by the formula:

css

Copy code

W = P * V

where P is the pressure and V is the volume.

The volume of a cylinder (which is the shape of the piston) is given by:

V = π * r² * h

where r is the radius of the base of the cylinder (half the diameter) and h is the height of the cylinder (or the stroke). Here, r = 1.05 cm = 0.0105 m and h = 38 cm = 0.38 m.

Let's calculate the volume first:

V = π * (0.0105 m)² * (0.38 m) = 0.000134 m³

Now we can calculate the work:

W = (2.6×10^5 N/m²) * (0.000134 m³) = 34.8 J

So, the work done in one stroke is approximately 34.8 Joules.

(b) The average force exerted on the piston is given by the formula:

F = P * A

where P is the pressure and A is the area of the base of the piston. The area of a circle is given by:

A = π * r²

So,

A = π * (0.0105 m)² = 0.000346 m²

Now we can calculate the force:

F = (2.6×10^5 N/m²) * (0.000346 m²) = 89.9 N

So, the average force exerted on the piston is approximately 89.9 Newtons.

Read more on work done here:https://brainly.com/question/8119756

#SPJ4

The velocity as a function of position can be expressed as v(s) = 1.5 + 0.5s ft/s, where s is the position in feet.

Given, a particle travels along a straight line with a constant acceleration. Let the acceleration be 'a' ft/s². According to the problem, when s = 4 ft, v = 3 ft/s and when s = 10 ft, v = 8 ft/s. Using the equations of motion, we can write:

v = u + at ...(1)

s = ut + 0.5at² ...(2)

where u is the initial velocity and s is the position.

Substituting the given values in equation (1) for s = 4 ft and s = 10 ft, we get:

3 = u + 4a ...(3)

8 = u + 10a ...(4)

Solving equations (3) and (4), we get u = -9 ft/s and a = 3/2 ft/s².

Substituting the values of u and a in equation (1), we get:

v(s) = -9 + 3/2s ft/s

Simplifying, we get:

v(s) = 1.5 + 0.5s ft/s

Therefore, the velocity as a function of position can be expressed as v(s) = 1.5 + 0.5s ft/s, where s is the position in feet.

To know more about velocity refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28738284#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The build up of electric charges on an object is called static electricity

A refrigerator with a coefficient of performance of 2.10 absorbs 3.46×104 J of heat from the cold reservoir each cycle. To determine the amount of mechanical energy required each cycle to operate the refrigerator, we use the equation:

COP = [tex]\frac{Qc}{W}[/tex]

where COP is the coefficient of performance, Qc is the amount of heat absorbed from the cold reservoir, and W is the amount of mechanical work required. Rearranging the equation to solve for W, we get:

W = [tex]\frac{Qc}{COP}[/tex]


Substituting the given values, we get:

W = 3.46×104 J / 2.10
W = 1.65×104 J

Therefore, the amount of mechanical energy required each cycle to operate the refrigerator is 1.65×104 J.

To determine the amount of heat discarded to the high-temperature reservoir during each cycle, we use the first law of thermodynamics, which states that the total energy in a closed system remains constant. The energy absorbed from the cold reservoir must be equal to the sum of the energy discarded to the high-temperature reservoir and the mechanical work done. So we have:

Qc = Qh + W

where Qh is the amount of heat discarded to the high-temperature reservoir. Rearranging the equation to solve for Qh, we get:

Qh = Qc - W

Substituting the given values, we get:

Qh = 3.46×104 J - 1.65×104 J
Qh = 1.81×104 J

Therefore, the amount of heat discarded to the high-temperature reservoir during each cycle is 1.81×104 J.

Learn more about energy here:

https://brainly.com/question/1932868

#SPJ11

The velocity of the particle when t = 0.5 s is -5.196 m/s.

The equation r=6t(1-4t^2)^0.5 defines the motion of a particle on a parabolic path, where r is the distance of the particle from its initial position, and t is the time elapsed since the particle started its motion.

To determine the velocity of the particle when t = 0 and t = 0.5 s, we need to differentiate the equation of motion with respect to time t to obtain the expression for the particle's velocity as a function of time.

The derivative of r with respect to t can be found using the chain rule and the power rule of differentiation as follows:

dr/dt = 6 [(1-4t^2)^0.5 + t (-0.5)(1-4t^2)^(-0.5)(-8t)]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

dr/dt = 6 [(1-4t^2)^0.5 - 4t^2(1-4t^2)^(-0.5)]

This is the expression for the particle's velocity as a function of time. To find the velocity when t = 0, we substitute t = 0 into the expression and get:

dr/dt = 6 [(1-4(0)^2)^0.5 - 4(0)^2(1-4(0)^2)^(-0.5)]

     = 6 (1-0) = 6 m/s

Therefore, the velocity of the particle when t = 0 is 6 m/s.

To find the velocity when t = 0.5 s, we substitute t = 0.5 into the expression and get:

dr/dt = 6 [(1-4(0.5)^2)^0.5 - 4(0.5)^2(1-4(0.5)^2)^(-0.5)]

     = 6 [(1-0.5^2)^0.5 - 4(0.5)^2(1-0.5^2)^(-0.5)]

     = 6 [(1-0.25)^0.5 - 4(0.25)(0.75)^(-0.5)]

     = 6 (0.866 - 1.732) = -5.196 m/s

Therefore, the velocity of the particle when t = 0.5 s is -5.196 m/s. Note that the negative sign indicates that the particle is moving downwards at this time.

Learn more about velocity

brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11

The inductance is 3.91 x 10^-5 H and the peak current at 90 MHz is approximately 14 μA.

Part A
To find the inductance (L), we can use the formula for inductive reactance (X_L) and Ohm's law (V = I * R).

X_L = 2 * π * f * L
V = I * X_L

Given the peak current (I) of 280 μA (0.00028 A) and the peak voltage (V) of 3.1 V at a frequency (f) of 45 MHz (45,000,000 Hz), we can rearrange the equations to solve for L:

L = V / (2 * π * f * I)

L = 3.1 V / (2 * π * 45,000,000 Hz * 0.00028 A)

L ≈ 3.91 x 10^-5 H

Part B
To find the peak current at 90 MHz, we can use the inductive reactance formula again:

X_L2 = 2 * π * f2 * L

Where f2 = 90 MHz (90,000,000 Hz).

X_L2 = 2 * π * 90,000,000 Hz * 3.91 x 10^-5 H

X_L2 ≈ 2.2 x 10^5 Ω

Now, we can use Ohm's law to find the peak current (I2) at 90 MHz:

I2 = V / X_L2

I2 = 3.1 V / 2.2 x 10^5  Ω

I2 ≈ 1.4 x 10^-5 A (or 14 μA)

To know more about the inductance, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/18575018

#SPJ11

The cell potential for the given reaction is +0.066V.

The cell potential can be calculated using the Nernst equation, which relates the standard cell potential to the concentrations of the reactants and products in the cell:

where Ecell is the cell potential, E°cell is the standard cell potential, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, n is the number of electrons transferred in the reaction, F is the Faraday constant, and Q is the reaction quotient.

In this case, the standard cell potential is 0 V, since the reaction involves two identical half-cells. The reaction quotient can be calculated using the concentrations of Fe³⁺ in the two half-cells:

Plugging in the values and solving for Ecell gives:

Therefore, the cell potential for the given reaction is +0.066V.

To learn more about cell potential, here

https://brainly.com/question/1313684

#SPJ4

If the sample in an experiment is initially at 40∘c∘c, and its temperature is doubled, then the new temperature in ∘c∘c will be 80∘c∘c. This is because temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules in a substance.

Doubling the temperature means doubling the kinetic energy of the molecules, which will result in a higher temperature reading on the thermometer.

It's important to note that doubling the temperature does not mean adding 40 degrees Celsius to the original temperature. Rather, it means multiplying the original temperature by a factor of 2. In this case, 40 x 2 = 80, which is the new temperature in Celsius.

It's also important to consider the implications of such a drastic increase in temperature. Depending on the nature of the experiment and the substance being tested, a temperature increase of this magnitude could have significant effects on the outcome. It's important to carefully monitor and control temperature changes in any experimental setting to ensure accurate and reliable results.

For more such questions on kinetic energy:

https://brainly.com/question/999862

#SPJ11

If the sample in an experiment is initially at 40∘c∘c, and its temperature is doubled, then the new temperature in ∘c∘c will be 80∘c∘c. This is because temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules in a substance.

Doubling the temperature means doubling the kinetic energy of the molecules, which will result in a higher temperature reading on the thermometer.

It's important to note that doubling the temperature does not mean adding 40 degrees Celsius to the original temperature. Rather, it means multiplying the original temperature by a factor of 2. In this case, 40 x 2 = 80, which is the new temperature in Celsius.

It's also important to consider the implications of such a drastic increase in temperature. Depending on the nature of the experiment and the substance being tested, a temperature increase of this magnitude could have significant effects on the outcome. It's important to carefully monitor and control temperature changes in any experimental setting to ensure accurate and reliable results.

Visit to know more about Kinetic energy:-

brainly.com/question/999862

#SPJ11

The expected position of a particle in the n = 8 state in an infinite well is 1.45 units.

The wave function for a particle in the nth state of an infinite potential well of width L is given by:

Ψₙ(x) = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L)

Here,

n = quantum number,

L = width of the well, and,

x = position of the particle.

In given case,

n = 8

∴ Ψ₈(x) = √(2/L) sin(8πx/2)

To find the expected position of a particle in the n = 8 state, we need to calculate the integral:

<x> = ∫ [Ψ₈(x)]² dx

Substituting the expression for Ψ₈(x)  and simplifying, we get:

<x> = (L/2) × ∫sin²(8πx/2) dx

Using the identity sin²θ = (1/2)(1-cos(2θ)), we can simplify this to:

<x> = (L/2) × ∫[(1/2)(1-cos(16πx/2)] dx

After Integrating, we will get:

<x> = (L/4) × [2 - (1/16π)sin(16π)]

Now, substituting L = 2, we get:

<x> = 1.45

Therefore, the expected position of a particle in the n = 8 state in an infinite well (for L = 2) is 1.45 units.

Learn more about infinite well here

brainly.com/question/31655058

#SPJ4