Answer:
B - Sanctions
Explanation:
The definition of sanctions is : ¨ a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule. ¨ I hope this helps!
Should there be limits on campaign contributions people and businesses can make to political campaigns. Why or Why not?
Answer:
yes because the people should decide not the super wealthy
It is pouring outside, so a woman enters a home to seek shelter from the rain. While there, she sees some awesome jewelry. She decides she wants to steal all of the jewelry, so she does.
DID SHE COMMIT BURGLARY?
Answer:
yes...you literally said that she stole it from the store. although when she came into the house she had no intention of crime, she eventually changed and the purpose of her being there was to commit crime
Ned decides to use instrumental methods to analyze trace evidence found at a crime scene. Which items might he use?
A.
test tubes
B.
Bunsen burner
C.
mass spectrometer
D.
lifting tape
E.
forceps
Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
no sir we don't do that here
who makes the us energy policy
Answer:
The energy policy of the United States is determined by federal, state, and local entities in the ... Prius may cost much less than the current model. Larger advanced-technology batteries have been suggested to make it plug-in rechargeable
TRUE or False - You can charge someone with both assault and battery - Civilly and Criminally. Again True or False???
Answer:
The answer is yes. Some actions involve both criminal and civil matters. For example, assault can be both a civil matter and a criminal matter. ... For example, a person who has intentionally killed another can be charged in criminal court with homicide and can also be sued civilly for wrongful death.
Explanation: (true)
Answer:
i think its true
Explanation i might be wrong
When a bill has passed Congress, and is ready for Presidential consideration, it is said to be which of the following?
OA. Debated
OB. Enrolled
Ос.
Amended
OD. Proposed
Answer:
B) Enrolled.
Explanation:
Answer:
Enrolled
Explanation:
I took the quiz. Im in k12.
what did Elle woods do in legally blonde to be a lawyer? (do not answer this)
Answer:
she went to harvard law
Explanation:
Answer:
she took classes in harvard law and proved herself to her ex that shes not a dumb blonde
Explanation:
Betty cut Anna when she slapped her. Anna suffered just a slight cut and a few drops of blood fell. Tom then got mad at Anna and shot her, and Anna lost a lot more blood, worth about as much fits into a 2 liter of Sprite. Anna bled to death.
DID BETTY CAUSE ANNA’S DEATH?
Answer:
okay according to me I think that but she was not responsible because she only cut anna and a few drops of blood fell but job short Anna and and bled to death so I think Tom was the one responsible for Anna's death
What can a candidate do to attract undecided voters In a swing state?
Choose more than one answer.
A. Cut back on fundraising efforts in that state
B. Select a running mate from that state
C. Refuse to participate in debates
D. Spend millions of dollars on local ads
E. Give speeches and organize rallies across the state
F. Switch parties in the middle of the race
Answer:
E D and B ia the answeres
Why does the Lincoln Project think provoking President Trump is a good idea?
Explanation:
They’re all made by the Lincoln Project, a political action committee led by high-profile Republicans who want to topple Trump, using firepower they’ve previously trained on Democrats.
And over the course of the last year, the group has moved from an insidery novelty to an online sensation to one that is raising real money. It might have a meaningful effect on this fall’s election.
Emphasis on “might.” The Lincoln Project’s strategy and tactics are a moving target, so it’s hard to get a grip on what it’s really doing and whether it will work. But the group most definitely has the attention of political insiders — some think it could be a useful ally to Joe Biden and actual Democrats; others suggest that it’s not much more than a publicity stunt. Either way, the Lincoln Project has your attention, whether you realize it or not.
Explain how the cases of Bakke, the VMI, and Grutter relate to the Fourteenth Amendment.
A man was arguing with a police officer and was shot in the stomach. Though he lost consciousness, he continued struggling with the officer while unconscious, causing the policeman’s gun to discharge. The police officer’s gunshot the police officer who died right away (adapted from People v. Newton).
WOULD THE UNCONSCIOUS MAN’S ACTIONS BE CONSIDERED VOLUNTARY (ACTION UNDER HIS CONTROL) OR INVOLUNTARY(ACTION NOT UNDER HIS CONTROL)? WHY?
WILL HE BE CONVICTED OF HOMICIDE?
Answer:
This is a bit complex. According to the case, People v. Newton the petitioner did not subject himself to criminal liability by virtue of a voluntary act. Therefore, the unconscious man's actions would be considered voluntary simply because he was operating his weapon. Moreover, he will not be convicted of homicide.
Explanation:
Can someone help me out with these? Please and thank you!
Marty stabs Chris’s hand while playing poker because he is mad he is losing. Ordinarily, a person could just wrap a wound like this and be fine. However, Chris has hemophilia, but he hasn’t told anyone even though he’s had it for years, which means he bleeds more than most people and can die from even minor injuries. He bleeds to death.
CAN MARTY BE CHARGED FOR THE DEATH OF CHRIS?
Answer:
It is mostly the responsibility of Marty. Marty should’ve been more careful when playing poker with Chris. Either way there is concequences for everything bad you do so yes Marty is going to be charged for the death of Chris.
Explanation:
In the case of DC vs Heller what was the constitutional issue addressed?
Answer:
i think D.C
Explanation:
what is multi party system
Answer:
a system with more than one political party
Explanation:
for example the USA has both a Republican and Democratic party along with green
Answer:
where there are a number of national as well as regional parties. A regional party may gain a majority and rule a particular state. If a party is represented in more than 4 states, it would be labelled a national party.
How was DNA evidence used to prove that Dr. Sam Sheppard did not murder his wife?
who do you want to win the election
What makes the Magna Carta a significant document?
Answer:
Its important because it influenced the constituition that we have today, not only that but it created no one else to be above the law including the King at the time.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
All are done a couple of days after birth to minimize stress except?
O iron shot
O clip needle teeth
O dock tail
O slaughter
A constituent is a person who is represented politically by a designated government official or
officeholder
True
O False
What argument can be made that would have kept president bush from becoming the running mate of john mccain in 2008?
Answer:
The dummies would argue two term limit but he would have been vice President not president
the first generation of computers used vaccum tubes .Why were they replaced by the transistors
Answer: They were replaced Because the transistor was so much smaller and consumed significantly less power, a computer system built with transistors was also much smaller, faster, and more efficient than a computer system built with vacuum tubes.
what term refers to criminal committed against people based on their race or religion
Answer:
hate crime
Explanation:
I searched it on google I attached a photo
Name a criminal case that involved the FBI being brought in
o did they catch them?
o if not who were the suspects?
o if they did, who was the unsub (unknown subject)?
o describe the unsub (unknown subject)
o how did he kill his victims?
Example:
o The BTK Strangler (BTK stands for bind, torture, kill)
o Caught Feb. 29, 2005
o Dennis Rader
o Dennis Lynn Rader is an American serial killer known as BTK or the BTK Strangler. Between 1974 and 1991, Rader killed ten people in Wichita and Park City, Kansas, and sent taunting letters to police and newspapers describing the details of his crimes.
o His motive was a twisted sexual fantasy. As said in his name, he binds his victims using a rope and then put a bag on his victims head. He would strangle his victims and feel their life leaving their body, which was part of his fantasy
To have a fair trial, juries must be a fair cross-section of the community. This most nearly means:
A. the community votes on jury members
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
C. the jury must reflect must consist of family members from the defendant and plaintiff.
D. the jury must be the same race as the defendant
Answer:
B. the jury must reflect the surrounding community in gender, race, color, religion, and ethnic background
Explanation:
Because it needs to be around your community
Example of Lax Conscience?
"Lax conscience" describes an in consistent assortment of moral values.
An example is feigning vertue for viciously self- serving reasons, such as helping little old ladies cross busy street, and stealing their purses in the process.
4. IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT, YOU MUST EXCHANGE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE
INFORMATION AND
WITH THE OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED.
A. proof of insurance only
B. proof of insurance and vehicle registration only
C. proof of insurance, vehicle registration, and current address
As a health care professional which rights re often the easiest to honor which rights are more difficult to honor
Answer:
There are four principal of healthcare rights . they are autonomy, beneficience Nonmalfeasance Integrity is the most Difficult right to Honour
When are jurors allowed to consider evidence? PLEASE ANSWERRRR FAST AND CORRECTLY WILL MARK BRAINLIESTTTT
Answer:
The jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision. The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases.
Explanation:
A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c). (b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.