Evaluate this expression: 39 ÷ (2 + 1) - 2 × (4 + 1).

Answer:

c. a translation down and to the left

Step-by-step explanation:

As per translation of a graph, the first transformation for this composition is translation down and to the left.

"A translation of a graph is its rigid movement, vertically or horizontally."

Here, A composition of transformations maps pre-image EFGH to final image E"F"G"H".

Trapezoid E F G H is shifted down and to the left to trapezoid E prime F prime G prime H prime.

Therefore, this transformation for this composition is translation down and to the left, and the second transformation is a reflection across line c.

Learn more about translation of a graph here: https://brainly.com/question/11788591

#SPJ3

Step-by-step explanation:

2A=h(a+b)

2A=ha+hb

2A-hb=ha

2A-hb/h=a

Answer:

balance $4

Step-by-step explanation:

12 - 8 = 4

Answer:

$4

Step-by-step explanation:

$ = 12 - 8

12 - 8 = $4

Answer:

its irrational if the number goes on forever my g

Answer:

B because the domains repeat themselves so it can not be a function

No; the domain values are not at regular intervals.

The correct option is b.

Mathematical functions with exponents include exponential functions. f(x) = bˣ, where b > 0 and b 1, is a fundamental exponential function.

In an exponential function, the domain values are usually at regular intervals, and the range values have a common factor or a common sum.

In the given data, the domain values are not at regular intervals.

The difference between 3 and 1 is 2, and the difference between 1 and -1 is 2, but the difference between -1 and -3 is -2.

This indicates that the domain values are not at regular intervals, which means that the data cannot be modeled by an exponential function.

Additionally, the range values also do not have a common factor or a common sum. The difference between consecutive y-values is 1, which is not a constant factor or sum.

Therefore, the data cannot be modeled by an exponential function.

To learn more about exponential;

https://brainly.com/question/14344314

#SPJ7

Answer:

please mark brainliest!

Step-by-step explanation:

2.57

Answer:

2.57

Hope this helps! Mark me brainliest

god bless!

Answer:

40%

Step-by-step explanation:

12 ÷ 20 = .6

You can convert the .6 to a percentage by multiplying it:

.6 x 100 = 60%

If 12 is 60% of 20, then that means 40% was taken away.

 Price of the sweater was reduced by 40%.

   Given in the question,

Percentage reduction in the price from $20 to $12 can be calculated from the expression,

Percentage reduction = [tex]\frac{\text{Change in price}}{\text{Original price}}\times 100[/tex]

                                     = [tex](\frac{20-12}{12})\times 100[/tex]

                                     = [tex]\frac{8}{12}\times 100[/tex]

                                     = 40%

     Therefore, price of the sweater was reduced by 40%.

Learn more,

https://brainly.com/question/877552

Answer:

idk if this helps but here:

Cutoff points are a crucial piece of calculus and are among the main things that understudies find out about in a calculus class. So, finding the constraint of a capacity implies figuring out what esteem the capacity approaches as it draws nearer and more like a specific point.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9152 yd

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

450 students ride a bus to school.

Step-by-step explanation:

If 3 out of 4 middle school students attend class by bus, it could be stated that 75% of the students use this means of transport to get to class (3/4 = 0.75).

Therefore, if this school has a total of 600 students, and 75% of them use the bus, it could be stated that 450 students attend school using this means of transport (600 x 75/100 = 450).

Answer:

450 students

Step-by-step explanation:

1/4 = 0.25

3/4 = 0.75

600 x 0.75 = 450 students

Hope this helps!

Answer:

53.04

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

52.904

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4(2x-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4 x (2x-3)

I hope it helps

Pls mark as Brainliest

Answer:

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu = 28.1[/tex]

 The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : \mu < 28.1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The population mean at 1960 - 1962 is  [tex]\mu_1 = 25.0[/tex]

    The population mean at 1999- 2002 is  [tex]\mu_2 = 28.1[/tex]

     The sample size is  n=  1034

     The sample mean is  [tex]M = 28.9[/tex]

 The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu = 28.1[/tex]

 The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : \mu < 28.1[/tex]

Answer:

25.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=-3+2(x-1)

f(15)=-3+2(15-1)

f(15)=-3+2(14)

f(15)=-3+28

f(15)=25

Answer:9

Step-by-step explanation: -2x2-3x-2+7=9

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

(-2x2) - (3x-2) + 7 = 9

Answer: hey panini

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

103/120

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

<2= 133

<3 = 47

<4 = 133

<5 = 47

<6 = 133

<7 = 47

<8 = 133

Step-by-step explanation:

im assuming a transversal is cutting the two lines, and that the 2 lines are parallel

2 = u must do 180-47 since theyre supplementary angles

3 = they are vertical angles

4 = 4 is a vertical angle to 2, but you can also do 180-47 since it is supp. to 3

5 = corresponding angle to the 47 degrees one

6 = alternate interior with 4, but also corresponding with 2

7 = vertical angles with 5 but also alternate exterior with the 47 degree angle , but also supplementary with both 6 and 8, and corresponding with 3

8= corresponding with 4, but also supplementary to 7 and 5. and vertical to 6

Answer:

<2= 133  <3 = 47   <4 = 133  <5 = 47  <6 = 133  <7 = 47  <8 = 133

Answer:

3.5 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

The question isn't formatted properly.

We have:

(x + 6) feet on each side of the square

(3x + 6) feet horizontally on the rectangle

(x - 1) feet vertically on the rectangular

First, we need to determine the perimeter of the square:

[tex]Perimeter = 4 * Length[/tex]

[tex]Perimeter = 4 * (x + 6)[/tex]

[tex]Perimeter = 4x + 24[/tex]

Next, we determine the perimeter of the rectangle

[tex]Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)[/tex]

[tex]Perimeter = 2(3x + 6 + x - 1)[/tex]

[tex]Perimeter = 2(3x + x+ 6 - 1)[/tex]

[tex]Perimeter = 2(4x+ 5)[/tex]

[tex]Perimeter = 8x+ 10[/tex]

Equate both perimeters:

[tex]8x + 10 = 4x + 24[/tex]

Collect Like Terms

[tex]8x - 4x = 24 - 10[/tex]

[tex]4x = 14[/tex]

Solve for x

[tex]x = 14/4[/tex]

[tex]x = 3.5[/tex]

Answer: y= -2x + 12

or f (y ) = 6 - [tex]\frac{y}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

just subtract the 2x to get the y alone

Answer:your answer is C!

Step-by-step explanation: I got it right

Answer:

c) Yes. When –4 is substituted for the variable, the result is a true statement.

Step-by-step explanation:

i verified with my teacher may i plz get brainliest

Answer:

In step 1 the y-intercept should be plotted at (0,-6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember that to find the Y intercept in any linear equation you need to use 0 as your X value, this means taking the formula in the y=mx+b form and replacing X with a 0.

Since the formula is y = -3/4x -6

We just insert a 0 insted of the "x"

y = -3/4(0) -6

y=0-6

y=6

So the y-intercept sould be placed in (0,-6)

That's what he did wrong when graphing the equation.

Answer:

Remember that to find the Y intercept in any linear equation you need to use 0 as your X value, this means taking the formula in the y=mx+b form and replacing X with a 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember that to find the Y intercept in any linear equation you need to use 0 as your X value, this means taking the formula in the y=mx+b form and replacing X with a 0.

Since the formula is y = -3/4x -6

We just insert a 0 insted of the "x"

y = -3/4(0) -6

y=0-6

y=6

So the y-intercept sould be placed in (0,-6)

That's what he did wrong when graphing the equation.

Answer:

[tex] \frac{3}{10} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] = \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{2}{5} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{3 \times 2}{4 \times 5} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{6}{20} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{6 \div 2}{20 \div 2} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{3}{10} [/tex]

Answer:

[tex] \frac{3}{10} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a shorter explanation. It's better to use this if you are good at maths or in a higher level.

[tex] \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{2}{5} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{6}{20} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{3}{10} [/tex]

That's it.

Answer: 1/4x(3x+8)

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

let me know if its correct!!

y=-4x-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y= -4x-2

Step-by-step explanation:

10- -6/-3-1

10+6/-3-1

16/-4

-4

Answer:

Option (2)

Step-by-step explanation:

A function 'f' has been given as,

f(x) = 3x + 1

And the inverse of this function is,

[tex]f^{-1}(x)=\frac{x-1}{3}[/tex]

We have to find the value of f(2).

So we will use the expression: f(x) = 3x + 1

By substituting x = 2 in this function,

f(2) = 3×2 + 1

     = 6 + 1

     = 7

This result tells us the value of the function at x = 2.

Therefore, Option (2) will be the answer.

Answer:

x = -5

Step-by-step explanation:

-6 + x = -11

x = -11 + 6

x = -5

Answer:

x=17

Step-by-step explanation:

17+ -6= 11

pls mark brainlest for real ('>')

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

how do u want me to solve it

9514 1404 393

Answer:

In order of improvement:

Step-by-step explanation:

In my engineering experience, a method of estimating should satisfy two requirements:

__

Multiplication and division by 2 are generally easy to perform mentally.

We note that 45% is about 50%.

  50% of 76 is 76/2 = 38 . . . a good starting estimate

45% is down 5% from 50%, so the actual value will be 5/50 = 10% lower than this first estimate

A good second estimate is 38 -0.10(40) = 34.

A better estimate is 38 -3.8 = 34.2, which is the actual value of the expression.

_____

Alternate approach

You could also transform the problem to 76% of 45, which is about 3/4 of 44, or about 33. Figuring the error adjustment on this approach is somewhat more difficult, as it is factors of 1/75 and 1/44 too low. 1 part in 44 is not too difficult to figure, as it is 33/44 = 3/4, so a better estimate is 33.75. It takes a calculator to figure 1 part in 75 of this, which is 0.45. Adding that amount gets you to the actual value of 34.2.