How do the quotation from mary tsukamoto, the photos, and the excerpt from executive order 9066 contrast with traditional american democratic principles?

Britain agreed to a division of the Oregon territory at the 49th parallel while retaining possession of Vancouver Island.

During negotiations between the United States and Britain over the Oregon territory in the mid-19th century, a compromise was reached that established the 49th parallel as the boundary line. This agreement, known as the Oregon Treaty of 1846, allowed Britain to retain possession of Vancouver Island while the United States gained control of the land south of the 49th parallel.

Vancouver Island, located off the southwestern coast of present-day Canada, was a valuable British possession due to its strategic location and natural resources. It served as a key outpost for British interests in the Pacific Northwest, including trade, maritime activities, and access to valuable resources such as timber and fish. By retaining Vancouver Island, Britain maintained a foothold in the region and preserved its influence and economic advantages in the Pacific Northwest despite ceding the majority of the Oregon territory to the United States.

to learn more about  Oregon Treaty of 1846 click here; brainly.com/question/29570726

#SPJ11

Continued racial discrimination and segregation in various aspects of society, such as housing, public facilities, and education, demonstrated that the Brown v. Board of Education decision had not effectively ended racial discrimination.

While the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, it did not bring an immediate end to racial discrimination. Numerous factors and subsequent events revealed that racial discrimination persisted in various forms, indicating that the impact of the Brown decision was limited.

One significant indicator was the persistence of racial segregation in schools. Despite the Court's ruling, many schools and districts resisted desegregation efforts, implementing tactics such as "token" integration, "separate but equal" policies, or outright defiance. The slow pace of desegregation efforts and the persistent existence of racially segregated schools illustrated that the Brown decision alone did not effectively eliminate racial discrimination in education.

Moreover, racial discrimination persisted in other areas beyond education. Housing discrimination, for example, prevented African Americans from accessing certain neighborhoods, perpetuating residential segregation and unequal opportunities. Discrimination in public facilities, such as restaurants, hotels, and transportation, also continued to limit equal access and treatment for people of color.

Additionally, discriminatory practices and attitudes persisted in employment, voting rights, and criminal justice , among other spheres. Racial disparities in income, employment opportunities, and criminal justice outcomes highlighted the ongoing presence of racial discrimination.

In summary, the existence of continued racial discrimination and segregation in housing, public facilities, education, employment, and other areas clearly demonstrated that the Brown v. Board of Education decision had not successfully ended racial discrimination. The decision marked an important milestone, but the struggle for racial equality and the dismantling of systemic discrimination required further efforts and legal developments beyond the initial ruling.

Learn more about justice here:

https://brainly.com/question/14830074

#SPJ11

One of President George Washington's economic policies was A. Creating a national bank

It should be noted that George Washington  can be seen as one that follows neutrality policy,  which help American merchants and ships to conduct business with both nations but supporting none in their military endeavors. However, Britain seized a large number of American ships and their supplies on the grounds that they supported the French war effort.

Establishing a national bank was one of President George Washington's economic initiatives.

Learn more about economic policies at:

https://brainly.com/question/25197410

#SPJ1

The outcome of allowing peasants to own land and keep the profits would depend on the specific context and policies surrounding the implementation of such a change.

In general, allowing peasants to own land and keep the profits could have positive effects on their economic and social well-being. It could give them a sense of ownership and control over their own lives and livelihoods, leading to greater investment in their land and more efficient use of resources.

This could result in increased agricultural productivity and higher yields, leading to greater food security and improved living standards for the peasants and their families.

However, there may also be challenges and potential negative consequences associated with such a change. For example, if the distribution of land ownership is unequal, some peasants may benefit more than others, potentially exacerbating existing social and economic inequalities.

Additionally, if the legal and institutional frameworks for land ownership and tenure are weak or nonexistent, peasants may face challenges in asserting their ownership rights and defending their land from encroachment by more powerful actors.

The impact of allowing peasants to own land and keep the profits would depend on a variety of factors, including the specific policies and institutions in place.

For more questions on peasants, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4066509

#SPJ11

The ACLU's statement can be seen as a reaction against violations of civil liberties before and during World War 1 in several ways.

Firstly, the statement explicitly calls out the government's use of the Espionage Act and Sedition Act to suppress free speech and dissent. These acts were used to prosecute individuals who spoke out against the war, leading to the arrest and imprisonment of thousands of Americans. The ACLU saw this as a clear violation of the First Amendment and worked to defend the rights of those individuals.

Additionally, the statement addresses the targeting of immigrant communities and the violation of their rights. During World War 1, there was a strong anti-immigrant sentiment in the country, with many immigrants being viewed as a threat to national security. The ACLU fought against the discrimination and mistreatment of immigrant communities, including those who were wrongly targeted and accused of being spies or sympathizers of enemy nations.

Overall, the ACLU's statement can be seen as a strong stance against government overreach and a defense of individual rights and liberties during a time of national crisis.

For more about violations:

https://brainly.com/question/31558707

#SPJ11

These powers is considered an implied power is: OC. creating a national bank.

Although the Constitution didn't specifically mention it the establishment of a national bank was regarded as a necessary and suitable step for exercising several listed authorities such as the authority to mint money and regulate trade.

The establishment of a national bank based on implied powers was upheld as constitutional in the 1819 Supreme Court decision of McCulloch v. Maryland.

Therefore the correct option is C.

Learn more about implied power here:https://brainly.com/question/1569756
#SPJ1

The government agency that establishes zoning codes

for building construction in a town or city is option A. Local government

Among the services provided, there are commonly recognized ones like education, social welfare, housing and urban development, and garbage disposal, as well as less known ones such as approval, commercial guidance, registry assistance, and vermin removal.

Local governments, such as city councils or municipal governments, have the authority to create and enforce these zoning codes based on the specific needs and priorities of their community

Learn more about government agency from

https://brainly.com/question/28149044

#SPJ1

The percent of change when 51 is increased to 98 is approximately 92.16%.

To find the percent of change when 51 is increased to 98, we can use the formula for percent change:

Percent Change = [(New Value - Old Value) / Old Value] * 100

First, we calculate the difference between the new value (98) and the old value (51):

Difference = New Value - Old Value

          = 98 - 51  

          = 47

Next, we divide the difference by the old value:

Percent Change = (Difference / Old Value) * 100

             = (47 / 51) * 100  

             ≈ 92.16

Therefore, the percent of change when 51 is increased to 98 is approximately 92.16%.

The percent of change represents the relative increase or decrease between two values. In this case, the value increased from 51 to 98, resulting in a positive percent of change. By calculating the difference between the new and old values and expressing it as a percentage of the old value, we determine the extent of the change.

In this scenario, the increase of 47 from 51 to 98 represents a significant change, accounting for approximately 92.16% of the original value. This indicates a substantial percentage increase in the value.

Learn more about percent of change

https://brainly.com/question/30370591

#SPJ11

The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were all attempts to solve the problem of the extension of slavery into the western territories. Option B

The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were all ways implement to deal with the conflict of whether slavery would be allowed in new places and states as the United States expanded westward.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 fought back the Missouri Compromise and allowed the people of each teritory to decide for themselvs whether or not to allow slavery.

Find more exercises on Missouri Compromise;

https://brainly.com/question/14020956

#SPJ1

"Me too" Republicanism refers to an ideology that argues for more representative government and less direct democracy.

"Me too" Republicanism is associated with the ideology that advocates for a more representative form of government and a reduced emphasis on direct democracy. It emphasizes the importance of elected representatives making decisions on behalf of the people rather than relying heavily on popular referendums or direct public participation in decision-making processes.

This ideology promotes the idea that elected officials should have the expertise and knowledge to make informed decisions on complex issues, rather than relying solely on the will of the majority.

"Me too" Republicans believe in a system where elected representatives represent and serve the interests of the people, while also recognizing the need for checks and balances and the protection of individual rights within a democratic framework.

To learn more about Republicanism click here: brainly.com/question/2605617

#SPJ11

Edwin Booth broke with the traditional wing-and-shutter set by placing a three-dimensional set design on the stage.

Prior to Edwin Booth's innovation, plays were typically performed on a flat, two-dimensional set with wings and shutters that would open and close to indicate different scenes. However, Booth saw the potential for more immersive and realistic productions by incorporating three-dimensional set that would allow for greater depth and dimensionality on stage.

Booth's set designs were often elaborate and realistic, featuring detailed backdrops, props, and furniture that would enhance the overall production value of the play. This innovation allowed for more dynamic and engaging performances, as actors could interact more realistically with their surroundings and the audience could be fully transported into the world of the play.

In addition to his contributions to set design, Edwin Booth was also known for his exceptional acting skills, and he was widely regarded as one of the greatest actors of his time. His innovations in set design helped to revolutionize the theater industry and set the stage for future advancements in production design.

Learn more about Three-dimensional set:

https://brainly.com/question/20306279

#SPJ11

The Works Progress Administration included all the following programs, except D. support for plays and concerts.

The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was a major part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal program, aimed at creating jobs for millions of unemployed Americans during the Great Depression. The WPA included a wide range of programs, such as renovating public buildings, constructing highways and bridges, providing work and scholarships for college and high school students, funding for sculptors and painters, support for plays and concerts, and more.

However, the WPA did not include enrolling workers in the military after the completion of projects. The program was designed to provide employment and training opportunities for American workers, not to prepare them for military service. While some WPA projects may have contributed indirectly to national defense, such as constructing airfields or improving infrastructure in military bases, the primary goal of the WPA was to alleviate the economic hardship and social dislocation caused by the Great Depression. The correct option is D. support for plays and concerts.

For more about Administration:

https://brainly.com/question/31844020

#SPJ11

Answer:

States Secific services to provide

Explanation:

One main difference between the united states constitution and state constitution is the state contitution is very demonstrative in specific services and regarding voting right/elections.

Answer:

because although the people that live inside of islam are considered to be apart of the reason why 9/11 happened its not accurate because they weren't the terrorist who helped carry out the attack

The north-south agenda has evolved significantly in the years since the Rio Summit. The changes and developments have shaped the priorities and dynamics between the global North and South.

The Rio Summit, also known as the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, took place in 1992. It marked a crucial moment in global discussions on sustainable development and the relationship between the developed North and developing South. Since then, the north-south agenda has undergone significant changes and transformations.

One notable development is the increased recognition of the importance of sustainable development and environmental concerns across the globe. Issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource management have gained prominence and become key components of the north-south agenda. This shift reflects the growing understanding that sustainable development is essential for the well-being of all nations and future generations.

Moreover, there have been advancements in international cooperation and the establishment of mechanisms to address these challenges. Efforts such as the adoption of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement on climate change demonstrate a collective commitment to address global issues and bridge the gaps between the North and South.

To learn more about biodiversity click here: brainly.com/question/13073382

#SPJ11

Many artists during different time periods sought a different world for various reasons.

Artists often seek a different world as a form of artistic expression and as a response to the social, political, and cultural climate of their time. They may challenge existing norms, question authority, and propose alternative visions through their work. Artists seek to provoke thought, inspire change, and create a more idealistic or utopian society through their art. Their motivations can range from personal experiences and observations to broader societal concerns such as injustice, inequality, war, or environmental issues. By envisioning a different world, artists aim to stimulate dialogue, raise awareness, and encourage viewers to consider alternative possibilities for a better future.

Learn more about   seeking a different world  here:

https://brainly.com/question/31951288

#SPJ11

The Boers were a mix of Dutch, French, and German colonists in South Africa.

The Boers were a group of Dutch, French, and German colonists who settled in South Africa in the 17th century and 18th centuries, blending their cultures and laying the foundation for the Afrikaner ethnic group. They were primarily farmers and established their own independent states in the region.

The Boers were known for their resistance against British colonialism and their conflicts with indigenous African groups. They played a significant role in shaping South African history and culture. Hence, the mix of mix of Dutch, French, and German colonists that settled in South Africa were Boers.

Learn more about Boers:

https://brainly.com/question/6370906

#SPJ11

One specific form of variety show that started in the late 1800's and still influences theatrical and film comedy today is known as Vaudeville.

Vaudeville was a form of entertainment that originated in France and became popular in the United States during the late 1800s. It was a variety show that featured a mixture of different acts such as comedy skits, music performances, dancing, and acrobatics.

Vaudeville shows were typically family-friendly and were designed to appeal to a wide audience. They often included slapstick comedy and other forms of physical comedy, as well as performances by famous vaudeville stars such as Harry Houdini and the Marx Brothers.

Vaudeville had a significant impact on the development of modern comedy. Many of the comedic techniques used in vaudeville, such as physical comedy and wordplay, continue to be used in contemporary comedy today. In addition, vaudeville helped to launch the careers of many famous comedians, including Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton.

Overall, vaudeville was an important form of entertainment that had a lasting impact on theatrical and film comedy. Its legacy can still be seen today in the many forms of comedy that continue to make us laugh.

To know more about vaudeville, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14534887#

#SPJ11

Hoover favored limited government intervention, while Roosevelt implemented a proactive and interventionist approach through the New Deal, signaling their contrasting strategies during the Great Depression.

Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt approached the Great Depression with contrasting strategies, reflecting their differing ideologies and perspectives on the role of government in the economy. Herbert Hoover, serving as president from 1929 to 1933, initially relied on a more hands-off approach.

He believed in limited government intervention and advocated for voluntary cooperation between businesses and individuals. Hoover believed that the economy would eventually self-correct and recover. In contrast, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who took office in 1933, implemented a more proactive and interventionist approach. He introduced the New Deal, a comprehensive set of programs and reforms aimed at providing relief, recovery, and reform.

Roosevelt's administration focused on stimulating economic growth through massive public works projects, such as the Works Progress Administration and the Civilian Conservation Corps. He also implemented regulations to stabilize the financial system, such as the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Glass-Steagall Act.

To learn more about Roosevelt

https://brainly.com/question/29797674

#SPJ4

The Iron Curtain meant the metaphorical boundary that separated Western Europe and the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War.

The Iron Curtain represented the political and ideological division between Western Europe and the Eastern Bloc nations during the Cold War. It was a term coined by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1946 to describe the isolation and separation created by the Soviet Union's control over Eastern European countries.

The Iron Curtain symbolized the physical and ideological barrier that prevented free movement, communication and interaction between the Eastern and Western parts of Europe. It represented the stark contrast between the democratic and capitalist societies of Western Europe and the communist regimes of the Eastern Bloc.

Read more about iron curtain

brainly.com/question/24125945

#SPJ1

The Iron Curtain was a term used to describe the ideological and physical division of Europe during the Cold War, particularly from the end of World War II in 1945 until the late 1980s.

The term "Iron Curtain" was popularized by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in a speech to describe the division between the communist countries of Eastern Europe, which were under the influence of the Soviet Union, and the non-communist countries of Western Europe.

The fall of the Iron Curtain began in 1989 with the peaceful revolutions in Eastern Europe, which saw the collapse of communist regimes and the opening of borders.

learn more about Winston Churchill: https://brainly.com/question/25495942

#SPJ1

The differences in women's dresses in England and France around 1800 were not directly influenced by any of the options provided (A, B, C, or D). Therefore, the correct answer is E, none of the above.

The differences in women's dresses in England and France around 1800 can be attributed to various factors, but none of the options mentioned in the given choices directly explain the phenomenon.

During this period, there was a significant exchange of cultural influences between England and France. While French fashion did have an impact on English styles, it was not solely due to the development of Anglomania among French women (Option A). Similarly, English women's rejection of French styles due to their dislike of Napoleon (Option B) or the ongoing war between England and France (Option C) cannot fully explain the evolution of dress styles.

Furthermore, the French support for the United States during its revolution against England (Option D) did not directly contribute to the differences in women's dresses in England and France.

To learn more about napoleon click here: brainly.com/question/31893529

#SPJ11

President Franklin D. Roosevelt made the above statement following the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese. The context of the statement was the immediate aftermath of the surprise attack on December 7, 1941, which propelled the United States into World War II.

The statement, "As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense, that always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us..." was made by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1941.

The context of this statement was the attack on Pearl Harbor, which occurred on December 7, 1941. The surprise attack by the Japanese on the US naval base in Hawaii resulted in significant loss of life and caused extensive damage to the American fleet.

In his address to the nation, President Roosevelt assumed his role as Commander-in-Chief and expressed his directive for all necessary measures to be taken for defense. He emphasized the gravity of the situation, urging the American people to remember the nature of the onslaught they had endured.

The attack on Pearl Harbor united the American people and galvanized their support for the war effort. It led to the declaration of war against Japan and ultimately resulted in the United States joining the Allied forces in the global conflict against the Axis powers. Roosevelt's statement reflected the resolve of the nation to fight back and secure victory in the face of this unprovoked attack.

Learn more about invasion here : brainly.com/question/11770601

#SPJ11

Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1939.

The case dealt with the issue of free speech rights and the ability of interest groups to hold public meetings in public spaces.

In Hague v. CIO, the Court held that the denial of permits by the Mayor of Jersey City, New Jersey, to the CIO to hold public meetings in public parks violated the First Amendment rights of the organization and its members. The Court emphasized that public spaces, such as parks, are considered traditional public forums where individuals and groups have a right to express their views.

An interest group, seeking to further its agenda, could utilize the holding in Hague v. CIO in several ways:

1. Right to Assembly: The case affirms the right of individuals and interest groups to assemble and hold meetings in public spaces. An interest group could leverage this ruling to secure permits and organize public gatherings or rallies to raise awareness about its agenda or advocate for policy changes.

2. Freedom of Speech: The Court's decision in Hague v. CIO highlights the protection of free speech rights. An interest group could utilize this precedent to argue against any attempts by authorities to limit or suppress their freedom of speech, such as restrictions on protest activities or attempts to silence dissenting voices.

3. Public Awareness and Mobilization: The case underscores the importance of public spaces as venues for public expression and engagement. An interest group could utilize the ruling to mobilize its supporters and rally public opinion by organizing events or demonstrations in public spaces, thereby gaining visibility and drawing attention to its cause.

4. Legal Precedent: The holding in Hague v. CIO established a legal precedent that can be cited in future court cases involving restrictions on the right to assemble or freedom of speech in public spaces. An interest group could invoke this precedent to challenge similar denials of permits or limitations on their activities, asserting their constitutional rights.

It is worth noting that the specific ways in which an interest group may leverage the holding in Hague v. CIO will depend on the nature of their agenda, the legal framework in place, and the particular circumstances of their advocacy efforts.

Learn more about freedom here:

https://brainly.com/question/7723076

#SPJ11

The Alps served as a natural barrier that protected Rome from invasion. However, they also presented Hannibal with an opportunity to attempt a surprise attack by crossing the mountains.

The Alps acted as a protective barrier for Rome against invasions from the north. Their rugged terrain and harsh climate made it difficult for enemy forces to penetrate and advance towards Rome. This natural defense system provided a significant advantage to the Roman Empire, ensuring the security of their capital city.

On the other hand, the Alps presented Hannibal, the Carthaginian general, with a strategic opportunity during the Second Punic War. In 218 BCE, Hannibal decided to march his army across the Alps to launch a surprise attack on Rome. While this route was treacherous and challenging, it allowed Hannibal to bypass the Roman defenses along the coast and catch the Romans off-guard. Hannibal's army successfully crossed the mountains, although they suffered significant losses due to the harsh conditions.

Learn more about invasions here:

https://brainly.com/question/909866

#SPJ11

The typical characteristics of slave religion in the first half of the nineteenth century included a combination of African traditions and Christian beliefs.

Enslaved individuals often incorporated aspects of their African religious practices into their Christian worship. It was not typically centered on enslaved chaplains who were mouthpieces for the owner's religious understanding. This syncretism allowed enslaved people to maintain a connection to their African heritage while also adapting to the religious practices of their enslavers.

The development of slave religion was often influenced by the social and cultural context of the plantation. Enslaved people sometimes used Christian rhetoric to critique the institution of slavery and express their desire for freedom, while at other times, slave owners used religion to control and subjugate their slaves

Overall, slave religion was a complex and dynamic phenomenon that reflected the unique experiences and cultural heritage of enslaved people. It incorporated elements of both African traditions and Christian beliefs, and its development was shaped by the social and cultural context of the plantation.

To know more about Religion refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/14043019

#SPJ11

Pitso went to buy the ingredients for 48 minutes and came back at 16:15. His friend claimed that he left after half-past 3 p.m. to verify his claim.

The ingredients that Pitso went to buy are not known, but it can be estimated that they were food products since he spent about 48 minutes purchasing them. His friend's claim that he left after half-past 3 p.m. is false. Since Pitso came back at 16:15 and spent 48 minutes buying the ingredients, he should have left around 15:27. If half-past three p.m. is equivalent to 15:30, Pitso left his home before half-past three p.m.

Therefore, Pitso's friend's claim is not true. Pitso left his home before half-past 3 p.m. and came back at 16:15. There was a 48-minute interval between the time he left and the time he returned. The ingredients that he purchased for 48 minutes can be anything, including food products.

To learn more about ingredients:

https://brainly.com/question/26532763

#SPJ11

Answer:

a bud

Explanation:

The Democratic Party supports multiple presidential candidates during the primary process to ensure diverse ideologies are represented, provide better representation for the party's demographic base, and promote competition that ultimately strengthens the eventual nominee.

Firstly, the Democratic Party consists of various factions with different ideologies and policy preferences. By having multiple candidates, the party ensures that a range of viewpoints is presented, and voters can choose the candidate that aligns best with their own beliefs. This encourages healthy debate and discussion within the party, ultimately refining its overall platform.

Secondly, having multiple candidates allows for better representation of the party's diverse demographic base. Candidates from different backgrounds, genders, races, and regions can bring unique perspectives and solutions to the table. This promotes inclusivity and encourages minority and underrepresented groups to engage in the political process.

Lastly, the competition among multiple candidates can strengthen the eventual nominee by allowing them to refine their campaign strategies, debate skills, and policy positions. This competitive  environment helps identify the strongest candidate who can successfully take on the opposing party's nominee in the general election.

For more questions on Democratic Party

https://brainly.com/question/24737666

#SPJ11

The events that led to V-E Day and V-J Day, marking the end of World War II, were a culmination of significant military campaigns and strategic victories by the Allied forces.

V-E Day, or Victory in Europe Day, was celebrated on May 8, 1945, following the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany. This surrender came after a series of Allied offensives, including the D-Day invasion of Normandy, the Battle of Stalingrad, and the steady advance of Allied forces through Europe. These campaigns weakened and eventually defeated Germany's military and political power, leading to the end of the war in Europe.

V-J Day, or Victory over Japan Day, occurred on August 15, 1945, after Japan's surrender to the Allied forces. The events that led to V-J Day included the dropping of atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in early August 1945, which devastated Japan's industrial and military capacity. Combined with the Soviet Union's declaration of war on Japan, these events forced Japan's surrender and brought an end to the war in the Pacific.

In summary, V-E Day was achieved through a series of successful military campaigns and the ultimate surrender of Nazi Germany, while V-J Day resulted from the atomic bombings and Japan's subsequent surrender. These milestones marked the end of World War II, bringing about a significant turning point in global history.

To learn more about V-E Day and V-J Day click here; brainly.com/question/30612577

#SPJ11