rewrite the following ratios in simplest form

The solutions on the given interval 0 < θ < 2π are θ = π/4 and θ = 7π/4.

The given equation is 2cos^2θ = 1.

Simplifying the equation, we get:

cos^2θ = 1/2

Taking the square root on both sides, we get:

cosθ = ±1/√2

Now, we know that cosθ is positive in the first and fourth quadrants. Hence,

cosθ = 1/√2 in the first quadrant (0 < θ < π/2)

cosθ = -1/√2 in the fourth quadrant (3π/2 < θ < 2π)

Therefore, the solutions on the given interval 0 < θ < 2π are:

θ = π/4 and θ = 7π/4

Learn more about interval here

https://brainly.com/question/29576113

#SPJ11

Answer: 1 divided by 8 = 1/8 = 0.125

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:0.125

Step-by-step explanation:

The integral value is approximately 4(π + 1) ≈ 16.5664 when rounded to four decimal places.

To solve the integral ∫(8 + 4cos(x)) dx from π/2 to 0, first, find the antiderivative of the integrand. The antiderivative of 8 is 8x, and the antiderivative of 4cos(x) is 4sin(x). Thus, the antiderivative is 8x + 4sin(x). Now, evaluate the antiderivative at the upper limit (π/2) and lower limit (0), and subtract the results:
(8(π/2) + 4sin(π/2)) - (8(0) + 4sin(0)) = 4π + 4 - 0 = 4(π + 1).
The integral value is approximately 4(π + 1) ≈ 16.5664 when rounded to four decimal places.

Learn more about upper limit here:

https://brainly.com/question/31030658

#SPJ11

Depth-first search (DFS) is a graph traversal algorithm that visits each vertex in a graph and explores as far as possible along each branch before backtracking. The time complexity of the DFS algorithm depends on the number of edges (|E|) and vertices (|V|) in the graph.

In DFS, each vertex is visited at most once and each edge is traversed at most twice (once for discovery and once for backtracking). Therefore, the time complexity of DFS is proportional to the number of edges and vertices in the graph. Specifically, the time complexity is O(|E| + |V|), where the O notation indicates the upper bound of the algorithm's time complexity.

Therefore, the statement "The time complexity of the DFS algorithm is O(|E| + |V|)" is true, and the answer is (A) True.

To know more about Depth-first search (DFS) visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28106599

#SPJ11

The values of these coefficients to set up the appropriate form of the particular solution is  A cos(x) + B sin(x) + C cos(3x) + D sin(3x)

The correct option is:   Yp = A cos(x) + B sin(x) + C cos(3x) + D sin(3x)

To set up the appropriate form of a particular solution for the given differential equation, we need to first determine the type of the forcing function. The forcing function in this case is 5sinx + 5cos3x, which is a combination of sine and cosine functions with different frequencies. Therefore, the appropriate form of the particular solution would be a combination of sine and cosine functions with coefficients that need to be determined.
The general form of the particular solution can be written as:
yp = A cos(x) + B sin(x) + C cos(3x) + D sin(3x)
Here, A, B, C, and D are the coefficients that need to be determined using the method of undetermined coefficients or variation of parameters. We do not need to determine the values of these coefficients to set up the appropriate form of the particular solution.
Therefore, the correct option is:
D. Yp = A cos(x) + B sin(x) + C cos(3x) + D sin(3x)

To know more about coefficients.

https://brainly.com/question/30845099

#SPJ11

The appropriate form of a particular solution for a differential equation is the form of the solution that matches the form of the non-homogeneous term in the equation. In this case, the non-homogeneous term is 5sin(x) + 5cos(3x), which is a sum of trigonometric functions.

Therefore, the appropriate form of a particular solution would be a linear combination of trigonometric functions, as seen in options B and D. However, we cannot determine the values of the coefficients without further information. It is important to note that the choice of the appropriate form of a particular solution is crucial in finding the complete solution to a differential equation, as it allows us to separate the homogeneous and non-homogeneous parts and solve them separately.
To set up the appropriate form of a particular solution, yp, for the given differential equation y(4) + 10y'' + 9y = 5sinx + 5cos3x, you need to consider the terms on the right-hand side of the equation. Since the right-hand side contains sin(x) and cos(3x) terms, the particular solution should also include these trigonometric functions.

The appropriate form of a particular solution, yp, is: yp = A cos x + B sin x + C cos 3x + D sin 3x (option D). In this form, A, B, C, and D are coefficients to be determined later, and the solution contains the necessary trigonometric functions that match the right-hand side of the given differential equation.

Learn more about trigonometric functions here: brainly.com/question/31962064

#SPJ11

The absolute minimum of f(x,y) is f(5/2, 7/2) = (5/2)² + (7/2)² = 61/4.

The absolute maximum of f(x,y) over the feasible region is f(7/5,0) = 49/25.

We want to minimize and maximize the function f(x,y) = x² + y² subject to the constraint 0 ≤ x,y and 5x + 7y ≤ 7.

First, we can rewrite the constraint as y ≤ (-5/7)x + 1, which is the equation of the line with slope -5/7 and y-intercept 1.

Now, we can visualize the feasible region of the constraint by graphing the line and the boundaries x = 0 and y = 0, which form a triangle.

We can see that the feasible region is a triangle with vertices at (0,0), (7/5,0), and (0,1).

To find the absolute minimum and maximum of f(x,y) over this region, we can use the method of Lagrange multipliers. We want to find the values of x and y that minimize or maximize the function f(x,y) subject to the constraint g(x,y) = 5x + 7y - 7 = 0.

The Lagrangian function is L(x,y,λ) = f(x,y) - λg(x,y) = x² + y² - λ(5x + 7y - 7).

Taking the partial derivatives with respect to x, y, and λ, we get:

∂L/∂x = 2x - 5λ = 0

∂L/∂y = 2y - 7λ = 0

∂L/∂λ = 5x + 7y - 7 = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get:

x = 5/2

y = 7/2

λ = 5/2

These values satisfy the necessary conditions for an extreme value, and they correspond to the point (5/2, 7/2) in the feasible region.

To determine whether this point corresponds to a minimum or maximum, we can check the second partial derivatives of f(x,y) and evaluate them at the critical point:

∂²f/∂x² = 2

∂²f/∂y² = 2

∂²f/∂x∂y = 0

The determinant of the Hessian matrix is 4 - 0 = 4, which is positive, so the critical point corresponds to a minimum of f(x,y) over the feasible region. Therefore, the absolute minimum of f(x,y) is f(5/2, 7/2) = (5/2)² + (7/2)² = 61/4.

To find the absolute maximum of f(x,y), we can evaluate the function at the vertices of the feasible region:

f(0,0) = 0

f(7/5,0) = (7/5)² + 0 = 49/25

f(0,1) = 1

To know more about function, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30922124#

#SPJ11

The angle we are given, as a whole, is a right angle. That means angles CDF and FDE are complementary, or add up to 90 degrees.

CDF + FDE = 90

2x + (x + 9) = 90

3x + 9 = 90

3x = 81

x = 27

Answer: x = 27

Hope this helps!

The function f(x) = 501170(0. 98)^x gives the population of a Texas city `x` years after 1995.

What was the population in 1985? (the initial population for this situation)\

Solution:Given,The function f(x) = 501170(0.98)^xgives the population of a Texas city `x` years after 1995.To find,The population in 1985 (the initial population for this situation).We know that 1985 is 10 years before 1995.

So to find the population in 1985,

we need to substitute x = -10 in the given function.Now,f(x) = 501170(0.98) ^xPutting x = -10,f(-10) = 501170(0.98)^(-10)f(-10) = 501170/0.98^10f(-10) = 501170/2.1589×10^6

Therefore, the population in 1985 (the initial population) was approximately 232 people.

To know more about initial Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32209767

#SPJ11

Answer: b

Step-by-step explanation: if I’m smart enough then this answer is right

One solution is t ≈ 0.4515, which corresponds to s ≈ 4.2496.

To solve this differential equation, we can use separation of variables:

ds/dt = 12t(3t^2 - 1)^3

ds/(3t(3t^2 - 1)^3) = 4dt

Integrating both sides:

∫ds/(3t(3t^2 - 1)^3) = ∫4dt

Using substitution, let u = 3t^2 - 1, du/dt = 6t

Then, we can rewrite the left-hand side as:

∫ds/(3t(3t^2 - 1)^3) = ∫du/(2u^3)

= -1/(u^2) + C1

Substituting back in u = 3t^2 - 1:

-1/(3t^2 - 1)^2 + C1 = 4t + C2

Using the initial condition s(1) = 3, we can solve for C2:

-1/(3(1)^2 - 1)^2 + C1 = 4(1) + C2

C2 = 2 - 1/16 + C1

Substituting C2 back into the equation, we get:

-1/(3t^2 - 1)^2 + C1 = 4t + 2 - 1/16 + C1

Simplifying:

-1/(3t^2 - 1)^2 = 4t + 2 - 1/16

Multiplying both sides by -(3t^2 - 1)^2:

1 = -(4t + 2 - 1/16)(3t^2 - 1)^2

Expanding and simplifying:

49t^6 - 48t^4 + 12t^2 - 1 = 0

This is a sixth-degree polynomial, which can be solved using numerical methods or approximations. One solution is t ≈ 0.4515, which corresponds to s ≈ 4.2496.

Learn more about solution here:

https://brainly.com/question/15757469

#SPJ11

For a sample of adults related to overpayment, the p-value for t-test is equals to the 0.195542. As p-value> 0.05, so, null hypothesis can't be rejected. So, claim about mean overpayment is true.

There is a health care provider claims that about mean. The claim is that mean overpayment on claims from an insurance company was 0. Consider a sample data of adults substantiate their belief. Sample size, n = 20

Sample mean overpayment, [tex]\bar x[/tex] = $3

standard deviations, s = $10

level of significance= 0.05

To test the claim let's consider the null and alternative hypothesis as [tex]H_0 : \mu = 0 \\ H_a : \mu < 0 [/tex]

Now, using t-test for testing the above hypothesis, [tex]t = \frac{ \bar x - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{ 3 - 0}{\frac{10}{\sqrt{20}}} [/tex]

= 1.3416407865

degree of freedom, df = 20 - 1 = 19

Now,using p-value calculator or t-distribution table, the value of p-value for t = 1.342 and degree of freedom 19 is equals to 0.195542. From Excel p-value formula is " = T.DIST(1.3416407865, 19)"

So, p-value = 0.195542 > 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Hence, claim of insurance company is true.

For more information about p-value, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14189134

#SPJ4

Answer: Using these three rules, we can generate any string in S recursively. For example, starting with "aa", we can apply rule 2 to generate "aab", then apply rule 2 again to generate "aabb", and so on.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let S be the set of all strings of a's and b's where all the strings contain exactly two consecutive a's.

The recursive definition of S is as follows:

The string "aa" is in S.

For any string s in S, the string "asb" is in S, where 's' represents any string in S.

No other strings are in S.

Explanation:

The first rule ensures that the set S contains at least one string, "aa", that satisfies the given conditions.

The second rule specifies that for any string s in S, the string "asb" is also in S, where 's' represents any string in S. This means that if we have a string in S, we can always generate a new string in S by adding an 'a' immediately before the first 'b' in s.

The resulting string will still contain exactly two consecutive 'a's and will still consist only of 'a's and 'b's.

The third rule specifies that no other strings are in S. This ensures that the set S only contains strings that satisfy the given conditions, namely that they contain exactly two consecutive 'a's and consist only of 'a's and 'b's.

To Know more about recursively refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30027987#

#SPJ11

If we diagonalize the matrix [3 -5; -9 0] as [6 -3; 0 -2] and raise it to the power of n, then [3 -5 -9 -12]n is given by the formula [6n(-3)n; 0 (-2)n].

The problem asks us to find a formula for the matrix [3 -5; -9 0]^n, where n is a positive integer. This formula involves powers of the eigenvalues and can be expressed using complex numbers in integers.

To do this, we first diagonalize the matrix by finding its eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

We obtain two eigenvalues λ1 = (3 + i√21)/2 and λ2 = (3 - i√21)/2, and corresponding eigenvectors v1 and v2.

Finally, we can substitute all the matrices and simplify to get the formula for [3 -5; -9 0]^n as a function of n. This formula involves powers of the eigenvalues and can be expressed using complex numbers in integers.

To learn more about “integer” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

The triangle in the image is a right triangle. We are given a side and an angle, and asked to find another side. Therefore, we should use a trigonometric function.

Trigonometric Functions: SOH-CAH-TOA

---sin = opposite/hypotenuse, cosine = adjacent/hypotenuse, tangent = opposite/adjacent

In this problem, looking from the angle, we are given the adjacent side and want to find the opposite side. This means we should use the tangent function.

tan(40) = x / 202

x = tan(40) * 202

x = 169.498

x (rounded) = 169 meters

Answer: the tower is 169 meters tall

Hope this helps!

The interval for 99.73% of the values in a population using the normal distribution (empirical rule) will generally be narrower than the interval obtained for the same percentage if Chebyshev's theorem is assumed.

The empirical rule, which applies to a normal distribution, states that 99.73% of the values will fall within three standard deviations (±3σ) of the mean.

In contrast, Chebyshev's theorem is a more general rule that applies to any distribution, stating that at least 1 - (1/k²) of the values will fall within k standard deviations of the mean.

For 99.73% coverage, Chebyshev's theorem requires k ≈ 4.36, making its interval wider. The empirical rule provides a more precise estimate for a normal distribution, leading to a narrower interval.

To know more about normal distribution click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29509087#

#SPJ11

The Fredholm theory of integral equations of the second kind is a powerful tool that allows us to solve certain types of integral equations. In particular, it allows us to reduce the problem of solving an integral equation to that of solving a linear system of equations.

To begin with, let's take a closer look at the integral equation you've been given:

ϕ(x)=(x2−x4)+λ∫1−1(x4+5x3y)ϕ(y)dy

This is a second kind integral equation because the unknown function ϕ appears both inside and outside the integral sign. In general, solving such an equation directly can be quite difficult. However, the Fredholm theory provides us with a systematic method for approaching this type of problem.

The first step is to rewrite the integral equation in a more convenient form. To do this, we'll introduce a new function K(x,y) called the kernel of the integral equation, defined by:

K(x,y) = x^4 + 5x^3y

Using this kernel, we can write the integral equation as:

ϕ(x) = (x^2 - x^4) + λ∫[-1,1]K(x,y)ϕ(y)dy

Now, we can apply the Fredholm theory by considering the operator T defined by:

(Tϕ)(x) = (x^2 - x^4) + λ∫[-1,1]K(x,y)ϕ(y)dy

In other words, T takes a function ϕ(x) and maps it to another function given by the right-hand side of the integral equation. Our goal is to find a solution ϕ(x) such that Tϕ = ϕ.

To apply the Fredholm theory, we need to show that T is a compact operator, which means that it maps a bounded set of functions to a set of functions that is relatively compact. In this case, we can show that T is compact by applying the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem.

Once we have established that T is a compact operator, we can use the Fredholm alternative to solve the integral equation. This states that either:

1. There exists a non-trivial solution ϕ(x) such that Tϕ = ϕ.

2. The equation Tϕ = ϕ has only the trivial solution ϕ(x) = 0.

In the first case, we can find the solution ϕ(x) by solving the linear system of equations:

(λI - T)ϕ = 0

where I is the identity operator. This system can be solved using standard techniques from linear algebra.

In the second case, we can conclude that there is no non-trivial solution to the integral equation.

So, to summarize, the Fredholm theory allows us to solve certain types of integral equations by reducing them to linear systems of equations. In the case of second kind integral equations, we can use the Fredholm alternative to determine whether a non-trivial solution exists. If it does, we can find it by solving the corresponding linear system.

To know more about Fredholm theory:

https://brainly.in/question/55766854

#SPJ11

The directional derivative of f at (1,1) in the direction of i+j is -2√2. To find the directional derivative at (1,1) in the direction of i+j.

We need to first find the unit vector in the direction of i+j, which is:
u = (1/√2)i + (1/√2)j
Then, we can use the formula for the directional derivative:
Duf(1,1) = ∇f(1,1) ⋅ u
where ∇f(1,1) is the gradient vector of f at (1,1), which is:
∇f(1,1) = fx(1,1)i + fy(1,1)j
Substituting the given partial derivatives, we get:
∇f(1,1) = (2-2√2)i - 2j
Finally, we can compute the directional derivative:
Duf(1,1) = (∇f(1,1) ⋅ u) = ((2-2√2)i - 2j) ⋅ ((1/√2)i + (1/√2)j)
         = (2-2√2)(1/√2) - 2(1/√2)
         = (√2 - √8) - √2
         = -√8
         = -2√2
Therefore, the directional derivative of f at (1,1) in the direction of i+j is -2√2.

To know more about directional derivative visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

Using Euler's method with Δt = 0.7, the approximate values for y1 and y2 are 0.556 and 0.340, respectively.

To approximate the values of y1 and y2 using Euler's method, we start with the initial condition y(0) = 0.8 and use the given differential equation dy/dt = (y - 1)(1 - t^2) with a step size of Δt = 0.7.

Approximate y1:

Using Euler's method, we compute y1 as follows:

y1 = y0 + Δt * (y0 - 1) * (1 - t0^2) = 0.8 + 0.7 * (0.8 - 1) * (1 - 0^2) = 0.556

Approximate y2:

Using Euler's method again, we calculate y2 as follows:

y2 = y1 + Δt * (y1 - 1) * (1 - t1^2) = 0.556 + 0.7 * (0.556 - 1) * (1 - 0.7^2) = 0.340

Therefore, the approximate value of y2 is 0.340.

Learn more about Euler's method

brainly.com/question/30699690

#SPJ11

Answer: Have you ever been really scared of something that doesn't usually happen? What were you scared of, and why?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Have you ever been afraid of something that would probably never happen?

Mathematically-probability is a part of math.

EX.

Maybe afraid of getting thousands of spider bites at school.   It's improbable(not likely to happen, the probability is very low), because there probably aren't thousands of spiders at your school.

Or

Maybe you live in alaska and your afraid of getting a snake near you.  But snakes would probably not live in alaska so it's unlikely you'll encounter one.

To determine if a vector b is a linear combination of given vectors a1, a2, and a3, set up the equation b = x * a1 + y * a2 + z * a3 (if a3 is given). Solve the system of equations for x, y, and z (if a3 is given). If there exist values for x, y (and z if a3 is given) that satisfy the equations, then b is a linear combination of a1, a2 (and a3 if given).

To determine if b is a linear combination of a1, a2, and a3 in Exercises 11 and 12, you will need to check if there exist scalars x, y, and z such that:
b = x * a1 + y * a2 + z * a3

For Exercise 11:
1. Write down the given vectors a1, a2, and b.
2. Set up the equation b = x * a1 + y * a2, as there is no a3 mentioned in this exercise.
3. Solve the system of equations for x and y.

For Exercise 12:
1. Write down the given vectors a1, a2, a3, and b.
2. Set up the equation b = x * a1 + y * a2 + z * a3.
3. Solve the system of equations for x, y, and z.

If you can find values for x, y (and z in Exercise 12) that satisfy the equations, then b is a linear combination of a1, a2 (and a3 in Exercise 12). Please provide the specific vectors for each exercise so I can assist you further in solving these problems.

Learn more about linear combination:

https://brainly.com/question/30888143

#SPJ11

The probability of getting exactly 4 tails when tossing 16 coins simultaneously is approximately 0.385 or 38.5%.

In order to calculate the probability of getting a specific number of tails when tossing multiple coins, we can use the binomial probability formula.

In this case, you want to calculate the probability of getting 4 tails out of 16 coins. Plugging the values into the formula:

P(X = 4) = (¹⁶C₄) * (0.5₄) * (0.5¹²))

Calculating the values:

P(X = 4) = (16! / (4! * (16-4)!)) * (0.5⁴) * (0.5¹²)

= (16! / (4! * 12!)) * (0.5⁴) * (0.5¹²)

= (16 * 15 * 14 * 13) / (4 * 3 * 2 * 1) * (0.5⁴) * (0.5¹²)

≈ 0.385

Therefore, the probability of getting exactly 4 tails when tossing 16 coins simultaneously is approximately 0.385 or 38.5%.

Learn more about probability on

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

If I toss 16 coins at the same time, what is the probability of getting 4 tails?

Answer:

To find the Taylor polynomial t3(x) for the function f(x) = xe^(-7x) centered at the number a = 0, we will use the formula for the nth-degree Taylor polynomial:

t_n(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + ... + f^n(a)(x-a)^n/n!

First, let's find the first few derivatives of f(x):

f(x) = xe^(-7x)

f'(x) = e^(-7x) - 7xe^(-7x)

f''(x) = 49xe^(-7x) - 14e^(-7x)

f'''(x) = -343xe^(-7x) + 147e^(-7x)

Next, let's evaluate these derivatives at a = 0:

f(0) = 0

f'(0) = 1

f''(0) = -14

f'''(0) = 147

Now we can substitute these values into the formula for t3(x):

t3(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + f''(0)x^2/2! + f'''(0)x^3/3!

t3(x) = 0 + 1x - 14x^2/2 + 147x^3/6

t3(x) = x - 7x^2 + 49/2 x^3

Therefore, the third-degree Taylor polynomial for f(x) centered at a = 0 is t3(x) = x - 7x^2 + 49/2 x^3.

To know more about Taylor polynomial refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31419648#

#SPJ11

The height of the apartment building is 27.5 feet.An apartment building has a height of 27.5 feet.

Given that an apartment building casts a shadow that is 40 feet long, and one of the tenants casts a shadow 8 feet long.The tenant is 5.5 feet tall.Find out how tall the apartment building is.To get the height of the apartment building, we need to find out the ratio of the height of the building to its shadow length.Let's assume that the height of the apartment building is h feet.Therefore, the ratio of the height of the building to its shadow length will be h/40.Let's assume that the height of the tenant is t feet.Therefore, the ratio of the height of the tenant to its shadow length will be t/8.We have the height of the tenant, which is 5.5 feet. Therefore,

t/8 = 5.5/8t = 5.5 * 8/8t = 5.5 feet

Now, we need to find the height of the apartment building.

To do so, we will cross-multiply the ratio of the building and its shadow length with the height of the tenant.

h/40 = t/8

On substituting the values, we geth/40 = 5.5/8

Multiplying both sides by 40, we get h = 40 * 5.5/8h = 27.5 feet

Therefore, the height of the apartment building is 27.5 feet.An apartment building has a height of 27.5 feet.

To know more about apartment building visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30035108

#SPJ11

The function T: R2 -> R2, T(x, y) = (x, 3) is not a linear transformation.

The function T: R2 -> R2, T(x, y) = (x, 3) is not a linear transformation because it does not satisfy the two properties of linearity:
1. T(cx, y) = cT(x, y) for any scalar c and any (x, y) in R2
2. T(x1+x2, y1+y2) = T(x1, y1) + T(x2, y2) for any (x1, y1), (x2, y2) in R2.

Specifically, the first property fails because if we let c=0, then T(cx, y) = T(0, y) = (0, 3), but cT(x, y) = 0T(x, y) = (0, 0), and these two values are not equal. Therefore, T(x, y) = (x, 3) is not a linear transformation.

Learn more about linear transformation:

https://brainly.com/question/30514241

#SPJ11

To find the volume of the solid, we need to integrate the area of the square cross-sections perpendicular to the x-axis over the length of the base. The correct answer is option e) 2009 3.

To find the volume of the solid, we need to integrate the area of the square cross-sections perpendicular to the x-axis over the length of the base. Since the cross-sections are squares, their areas are given by the square of their side lengths, which are equal to the corresponding y-coordinates of the points on the circle x2 + y2 = 25. Therefore, the area of each cross-section is (2y)2 = 4y2, and the volume of the solid is given by the integral:

V = ∫-5^5 4y2 dx

Since the base is symmetric about the y-axis, we can compute the volume of the solid in terms of the integral of 4y2 over the interval [0, 5] and multiply by 2. Thus,

V = 2 ∫0^5 4y2 dx

= 2 [4y3/3]0^5

= 2 (4(125/3))

= 2009 3

Therefore, the volume of the solid is 2009 3, and the correct answer is e) 2009 3.

Learn more about perpendicular here:

https://brainly.com/question/29268451

#SPJ11

The difference between the maximum and minimum of (x²y²)/49 is 1, if x and y are two non negative numbers and x/y = 7.

We are given x/y = 7. So, we can write x as 7y.

Now, we need to find the difference between the maximum and minimum of (x²y²)/49.

(x²y²)/49 = [(7y)²*y²]/49 = (49y⁴)/49 = y⁴.

As y is non-negative, the minimum value of y is 0. Therefore, the minimum value of y⁴ is also 0.

To find the maximum value of y⁴, we use the fact that x/y = 7. So, x = 7y.

Therefore, (x²y²)/49 = [(7y)²*y²]/49 = (49y⁴)/49 = y⁴.

As x and y are non-negative, the maximum value of y⁴ occurs when x and y are as large as possible subject to x/y = 7. This occurs when x = 7y and y is as large as possible, which means y = 1.

Therefore, the maximum value of y⁴ is 1⁴ = 1.

So, the difference between the maximum and minimum of

(x²y²)/49 = 1 - 0 = 1.

To learn more about non negative : https://brainly.com/question/24368848

#SPJ11

a) The simplified left-hand side of the equation as B + CD + BD. Therefore, the equation is true. b) The simplified left-hand side of the equation as 2WY + WXZ + WYZ. Therefore, the equation is true. c) The left-hand side of the equation is also AD + AB + CD + BC, the equation is true.

(a) Using algebraic manipulation, we can simplify the left-hand side of the equation as follows:

ABC + BCD + BC + CD = BC(A + D) + CD(A + B)

= BC + CD (A + B + D)

Since B + CD = B(1 + D) + CD = B + CD + BD, we can rewrite the simplified left-hand side of the equation as B + CD + BD. Therefore, the equation is true.

(b) Similarly, we can simplify the left-hand side of the equation as follows:

WY + WYZ + WXZ + WXY = WY(1 + Z) + WX(Z + Y)

= WY + WXZ + WYZ + XYZ

Since WY + WXZ + XYZ = WY + WXZ + WY(1 + Z) = WY + WXZ + WY + WYZ = 2WY + WXZ + WYZ, we can rewrite the simplified left-hand side of the equation as 2WY + WXZ + WYZ. Therefore, the equation is true.

(c) Using algebraic manipulation, we can expand the right-hand side of the equation as follows:

(A + B + C + D)(A + B + C + D) = A2 + B2 + C2 + D2 + AB + AC + AD + BC + BD + CD

= AD + AB + CD + BC + A2 + B2 + C2 + D2 + AB + AC + BD

= AD + AB + CD + BC (A + B + C + D + A + B + C + D)

Since the left-hand side of the equation is also AD + AB + CD + BC, the equation is true.

Learn more about algebraic manipulation here:

https://brainly.com/question/12602543

#SPJ11

We simplify the expression to get y = 7x - 77. This is the equation in the form y = f(x) without the parameter t.

To eliminate the parameter t, we need to isolate t in one of the equations and substitute it into the other equation. Let's start by isolating t in the first equation:
x = 11 + t
t = x - 11

Now we can substitute this expression for t into the second equation:
y = 7t(x)
y = 7(x - 11)
y = 7x - 77

So the equation in the form y = f(x) without the parameter t is:
y = 7x - 77

This is the final answer.

Know more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

To find the zeros of the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x - 6, we need to solve for x when f(x) = 0. We can do this by factoring the quadratic expression or by using the quadratic formula. Once we find the zeros, we can plot them on a graph to show where the function intersects the x-axis.

Factoring method:

f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x - 6

f(x) = 2(x^2 + 2x - 3)

f(x) = 2(x + 3)(x - 1)

The zeros of the function are x = -3 and x = 1.

Using the quadratic formula:

The quadratic formula is:

x = (-b ± sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a

where a, b, and c are the coefficients of the quadratic expression ax^2 + bx + c.

For the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x - 6, we have:

a = 2, b = 4, c = -6

x = (-4 ± sqrt(4^2 - 4(2)(-6))) / 2(2)

x = (-4 ± sqrt(64)) / 4

x = (-4 ± 8) / 4

x = -3, 1

The zeros of the function are x = -3 and x = 1.

The graph that correctly shows the zeros of the function f(x) = 2x^2 + 4x - 6 is a graph with x-axis labeled with -3 and 1, and the curve of the function intersecting the x-axis at those points. This can be represented by a graph that looks like an inverted U-shape with the x-axis being intersected at x = -3 and x = 1.

The missing length in the given figure is 10 ft

In the figure there are two rectangle.

We have to find the missing length of the rectangle

The length of one rectangle is 16 ft.

The other length of rectangle is splitted to two parts

One length has 6 ft then the other length is 10 ft

Hence, the missing length in the given figure is 10 ft

To learn more on Area click:

https://brainly.com/question/20693059

#SPJ1