Answer:
natural disasters, car accidents, violence, and natural physical events
Explanation:
ion got no explanation, quizlet helped me
The Implied consent law states that : a. You must submit to a sobriety test when asked by a law enforcement officer. b. You can agree to plea bargain if arrested for DUI. c. you will lose your license for six months if convicted.
d. your license will automatically be canceled if you are convicted of
d.u.i.
The Implied consent law states that option A: You must submit to a sobriety test when asked by a law enforcement officer.
According to the implied consent statute, when a law enforcement official requests that you submit to chemical testing of your breath, blood, or urine to discover whether you have consumed alcohol or drugs, you have given your consent. Therefore, option A proves to be he right choice.
Law enforcement organizations employ implied consent statutes as a tactic to obtain proof that you were driving while intoxicated. Without a BAC test, a DUI charge may still be brought against you. However, the results of these tests show that you were inebriated, which might be used against you in a DUI case. Even some states claim that the legislation governing implied consent applies to initial breathalyzer testing (PBT). A PBT is essentially another kind of field sobriety test that law enforcement does to gauge a subject's level of intoxication.
To know more about implied consent law, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/1283484
#SPJ4
What is the main role of the executive branch of government?
The main role of the executive branch of government is the enforcement of law in the country.
The President of the United States, is given control over the Executive Branch. He also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
The regular enforcement and implementation of federal legislation is the responsibility of the Cabinet and independent federal agencies.
The Constitution provides very little guidance for how the executive branch should be set up.
The "executive departments" that served as the foundation for the cabinet are mentioned. While relying mostly on the White House staff, a president will consult cabinet members for guidance in their respective fields.
However, cabinet secretaries are typically in charge of overseeing the agencies they lead.
To know more about the executive branch, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18052177
#SPJ4
is the property of being physically or mentally capable.
A . Grit
B. Individualism
C. Self confidence
D. Strength
Answer:
D.Strength
ALL done
Which of the following is an example of an action-benefit statement?
A-Led a team of 100 individuals in a community awareness campaign
B-I was on the softball team in high school, but we did not win
C-Good customer service skills
D-Responsible for managing a team
E-Can do office work real good
Answer:
a
Explanation:
please mark brainliest
What view of government does Thoreau Express?
Government, according to Thoreau, is "a means by which mankind would fain succeed in leaving one another alone."
As per Thoreau, Government is in place with the agreement of the governed in order to protect the right to personal liberty and the pursuit of wisdom.
To gain the right to levy taxes on its inhabitants, according to Thoreau, the government must put an end to its unfair practices. He went on to say that as long as the government did unfair things, conscientious people had to decide whether to pay their taxes or not and rebel against it.
The main takeaway from Thoreau's book Walden is to live simply, on your own, and sensibly. He advises individuals to attempt to live a free and uncommitted life, free from the trade economy and contemporary labor, and other things that make life too complicated. He also stresses the value of having as close of a direct relationship with Nature as possible.
For more questions on Thoreau's view on government
https://brainly.com/question/14724664
#SPJ4
Does the Supreme Court protect constitutional rights?
The Supreme Court does indeed uphold constitutional rights. These courts are, nevertheless, occasionally referred to as "constitutional courts."
For instance, because it was one of the first courts to find a statute to be unconstitutional, the Supreme Court of the United States is regarded as the oldest constitutional court in the world.
The Supreme Court, which serves as the final arbitrator of law, upholds the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans.
In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's advocate and interpreter.
In this system, the Supreme Court has a challenging job since it can strike down legislation or executive orders that, in its expert opinion, are unconstitutional.
To learn more about Constitution, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
What are the three types of deterrence? Apply ideas on deterrence from noteworthy cases that have happened in the last 5 years. Or you can use examples as displayed in American cinema (3).
By terrifying a particular defendant with punishment, specific deterrence reduces crime. By terrifying the public with the punishment of a specific defendant, general deterrence reduces crime. By removing a defendant from society, incapacitation reduces crime.
What three elements make up deterrence theory?These three essential elements, known as the "3 Cs" (Severity, Certainty, and Celerity) of punishment, make up traditional deterrence theory.
Which of the three deterrence factors do you think is most crucial?One of the three deterrence components. Certainty is the probability that a person will be apprehended and punished for a crime they have committed. The most crucial of the three components is certainty.
To Know more about particular defendant
https://brainly.com/question/14527091
#SPJ1
Can the Supreme Court remove a justice?
The Justices can only be removed through impeachment, and the Constitution stipulates that they serve for as long as they see fit.
Yes, through the same process that was used to remove a U.S. president from office: impeachment. After the House decided to impeach, the Senate would hold a trial and decide whether to remove the justice. In Article II, section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, the grounds for impeachment and conviction are listed as treason, bribery, or other serious offences. Only Samuel Chase, a judge of the Supreme Court, has ever been impeached. In 1804, the associate justice was charged with "arbitrary and repressive administration of cases" and it was said that political bias was a factor in his judgments.
He was ruled not guilty in 1805 after going through with his Senate trial.
To learn more about Impeachment, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ4
What type of government Thoreau prefers at the beginning of civil disobedience?
Thoreau prefers a laissez faire type of government that is a capitalist form.
The phrase “that government is best which governs least” is most often attributed to Henry David Thoreau. He sued this in his 1849 “Civil Disobedience”
According to him, the less the government held matters of governance in its hand, the better it would be for the citizens of that country.
He often criticized the government's lack of consideration towards the welfare of the citizens.
He also used the term machine to describe the political apparatus of the government where it sued the 'mass of man' for its own benefits.
A laissez faire form of government would mean relatively lesser power in the hands of the government and more autonomy in the hands of individuals even if restricted to areas of economic interest alone.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
If a new joint tenants with right of survivorship account is opened, all of the following statements are true except
If a new joint tenants with right of survivorship account is opened, checks cannot be drawn in the name of either party.
The right of survivorship is a right that bestows each tenant an undivided interest in the whole estate.
The tenant’s interest disappears when one tenant dies. Also, the tenants’ shares increases proportionally and obtain the rights to the entire estate.
Tenancies that posses the right of survivorship can be divided into two types- joint tenancy and tenancy by the entirety.
In a joint tenancy, the right of survivorship may be severed, converting the estate to a tenancy in common, by means of partition. This can either be voluntary or involuntary.
On the other hand, where there is a right of survivorship in a tenancy by the entirety, it may be may be severed by divorce, mutual agreement, or even by execution by a joint creditor.
However, the right of survivorship cannot be terminated by an involuntary partition in a tenancy by the entirety,
To know more about right of survivorship click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15542054
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. the complete question is:
If a new joint tenants with rights of survivorship account is opened, all of the following statements are true EXCEPT:
A) orders may be given by either party.
B) in the event of death, the decedent's interest in the account goes to the other party.
C) checks may be drawn in the name of either party.
D) mail may be sent to either party (with the permission of each party).
Leah gains access to government records and alters certain dates and amounts in her favor. This is a. embezzlement. b. forgery. c. larceny. d. no crime.
The correct answer is B) forgery. Leah obtains access to official documents and changes specific dates and quantities to her advantage. This is a fabrication of embezzlement.
Altering, using fake documents and tools, and writing falsely on any documents with the intent to fool the other are all examples of forgery and fabrication. When someone else signs or when someone writes something that is false, it happens.
False document utterance is a serious offence that carries a penalty. Documents that can be falsified include checks, negotiable instruments, contracts, wills, and deeds, to name a few. However, forgery also includes some documents that are routinely used in the business sector despite having no legal standing, such as a fake letter of recommendation for employment.
Read more about records embezzlement at
https://brainly.com/question/12882997
#SPJ4
All budgetary changes have consequences.
Describe the impact of the three largest cuts you made. How would these cuts impact the economy and the president’s reelection chances?
Explain your answer in at least four complete sentences.
Answer:
Explanation:
I'm sorry, I cannot answer your question about the specific cuts you made as I do not have any information about what cuts you are referring to or their context. In general, cutting a budget can have a variety of different impacts depending on what the budget is for and the size of the cut.
For example, cutting the budget for a government program that provides assistance to low-income families could have a negative impact on those families and on the economy as a whole, as they may have less money to spend, which can lead to slower economic growth. Similarly, cutting the budget for infrastructure projects could also have a negative impact on the economy by slowing economic growth and leading to higher unemployment.
On the other hand, cutting the budget for a government program that is inefficient or duplicative could have a positive impact on the economy by freeing up resources that can be used more effectively elsewhere.
Regarding the impact on the president's reelection chances, the impact would depend on how the public perceive the budget cuts, their approval of the actions, and how those budget cuts are perceived to have affected the economy and their daily life. A strong economy tends to bode well for the reelection of a president, but if people begin to feel the negative effects of budget cuts and those cuts are perceived negatively by the public, it could impact the president's approval rating, and could decrease the chances of being reelected.
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] has opened up law enforcement jobs to which of the following
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] has opened up law enforcement jobs to Some people with disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a state civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in everyday life.
The ADA prohibits discrimination based on disability, just as other civil rights laws prohibit discrimination based on race, color, sex, national origin, age, or religion.
The ADA ensures that people with disabilities have equal opportunities with all others to pursue employment opportunities, purchase goods and services, and participate in state and local government programs.
To prevent discrimination against people with disabilities, the ADA has requirements that apply to many everyday situations.
To know more about ‘The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28202627
#SPJ4
The duty of care that each of us must follow is to behave as a reasonable person. a. True b. False.
The correct answer is True. The standard of care that each of us must uphold is to act in a prudent manner.
People have a "duty of care" to behave toward others in a particular way and in accordance with predetermined criteria. The meaning of the phrase can vary based on the legal context in which it is employed. In order to understand what is morally right or wrong, just or unjust, ethics explores the intellectual justifications for our moral judgements. In a broader sense, ethics considers how people interact with one another and with nature, as well as their own freedom, responsibility, and sense of justice.
The degree of care, prudence, and judgement that a reasonable person would use in a specific situation is referred to as a standard of care. There are many variables that will affect the extent and character of a standard of care under tort law.
Read more about behave person at
https://brainly.com/question/28060988
#SPJ4
What are Mendel's 4 hypothesis?
The first of Mendel's four postulates and laws of inheritance is the principle of paired factors. The second is the principle of dominance. The third is the law of segregation or the law of purity of gametes, while the fourth is the law of independent assortment
Principles of Paired Factors: Postulate I
A character in an organism (diploid) is represented by at least two components. The two components are located at the same locus on the two homologous chromosomes. They might be a different or same representation of the same character. Alleles or allelomorphs are factors that indicate the same or alternate version of a character.
Postulate II. Dominance Principle:
The traits that occur in the hybrids of the F1 generation are always the dominant characters, and those that do not present in F1 progeny are always the recessive characters when two homozygous individuals with one or more sets of opposing characters are crossed.
Postulate III. Mendel's First Law of Inheritance, often known as the Law of Segregation or Law of Purity of Gametes:
When gametogenesis (the formation of gametes) or sporogenesis (the formation of spores), the two factors (alleles) of a trait that remain together in an individual, are randomly distributed to different gametes and then paired again in different offspring according to the probability principle, they maintain their identity and remain distinct. The law of segregation is sometimes referred to as the "law of purity of gametes" because two alleles remain together in their original, unaltered state without interacting, influencing, or combining.
Law of Independent Assortment (also known as Mendel's Second Law of Inheritance) Postulate IV:
Mendel considered two pairs of opposing characteristics and examined their inheritance after being pleased with monohybrid crossings (i.e., di-hybrid cross).
This law states that "the two components (genes) of each opposing character (trait) at the moment of gamete development assort or separate independently of the factors of other characters and become arbitrarily rearranged in the offspring."
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
The totality of the circumstances test is used to determine if a pretrial identification procedure has violated which right
To evaluate whether a pretrial identification technique breached the protection against self-incrimination, the totality of the circumstances test is utilised.
Criminal defendants are also shielded from testifying by the Fifth Amendment if they could implicate themselves in the testimony. If a witness feels that providing an answer could put them in jeopardy, they may "plead the Fifth" and refuse to answer.
Self-incriminating remarks made by a person will not be admissible in court if they are not informed of their rights, which include the right to an attorney and the right to keep silent.
These techniques include DNA profiling, the most widely used Test Identification Parade, the skull superimposition technique, and fingerprints and footprints.
Read more about identification procedure at
https://brainly.com/question/15992025
#SPJ4
Do you agree that verdicts in criminal trials should be unanimous and that jurors should vote for guilt only if they are convicted of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Answer: yes.
Explanation:
What was Mendel's initial question?
“Police have the power to investigate under the Criminal Procedure Code...” Based on the above statement, discuss the criminal investigative process under the criminal justice system in Malaysia.
Answer:
The criminal investigative process in Malaysia is guided by the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC). The Code outlines the powers of the police to investigate criminal offences and provides a framework for the investigation process.
The CPC sets out the powers of the police to investigate criminal matters, such as the power to arrest and search suspects, to collect evidence, to question suspects and witnesses, and to carry out investigations. It also provides guidelines on when the police should seek the assistance of the Attorney General, and when they should refer investigations to the Public Prosecutor.
Under the CPC, the police have the power to investigate and collect evidence related to criminal offences. The police are empowered to investigate the scene of the crime, search the premises of suspects, take statements from witnesses, and collect physical evidence. In order to identify suspects, the police may also use surveillance techniques such as wiretapping.
The CPC also provides guidelines on the treatment of suspects. The police must treat suspects fairly and must not use any force or coercion to obtain information from them. The police must also inform suspects of their rights and allow them to consult a lawyer before answering any questions.
Once the police have completed their investigation, they will submit the evidence to the Public Prosecutor for consideration. The Prosecutor will then review the evidence and decide whether to prosecute the suspect or not. If the Prosecutor decides to prosecute, then the case will proceed to court.
In conclusion, the criminal investigative process in Malaysia is guided by the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Code outlines the powers of the police to investigate criminal offences and provides a framework for the investigation process. It also outlines the rights of suspects and the procedures for submitting evidence to the Public Prosecutor.
If a party against whom enforcement of an oral contract is sought admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract will be enforceable
True
False
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract is enforceable. True
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract "admits" in court that a contract was made, the contract, however admitted, will be enforceable.Contrary to popular belief, oral contracts are legally binding. They are usually not in your best interests and result in a "he said, she said" argument. However, as long as there is sufficient evidence, a court will enforce an oral agreement. However, there is one exception to this rule, and it is known as the Statute of Frauds. An oral agreement can be legally enforceable if it complies with a law known as the statute of frauds.
Lerarn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ4
an individual who has been the subject of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal
True, a person who has been the victim of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal.
Alleged: stated to be true but not yet proven to be true; the crime may be referred to as the "alleged crime" until the trial is completed.To allege is to assert or claim something as true; to make an allegation. [Last updated by the Wex Definitions Team in June 2021] criminal justice. Prosecute means to initiate criminal proceedings against someone in criminal law. The prosecuting attorney, for example, a local District Attorney, state Attorney General, or federal United States Attorney, initiates such actions. Alleged can also be used as the past tense of the verb allege, which means to claim before or without proof.
Learn more about prosecute here:
https://brainly.com/question/29415296
#SPJ4
I Reciprocity a ueful tool to overcome problem that arie from relying on eaily-available information
The statement that Reciprocity is a useful tool to overcome problems that arise from relying on easily-available information is false.
Reciprocity is the fundamental aspect which is used to negotiate in tough situations. It is used to influence people and requires other features such as commitment, consistency and psychological approach as well. In social dilemma when people are not ready to cooperate, this technique helps in sorting the problems and coming to a conclusive point. The use of reciprocity involves healthy communication skills, dialogue and action, discussion and feedback and brain-storming or training. Thus a comprehensive approach enables the better negotiation capacity among the parties involved and they agree to mutual decisions and objectives.
Learn more about reciprocity at:
brainly.com/question/18575915
#SPJ4
What are the 3 basic principles that Mendel was able to discover about genetics?
Mendel translated the findings of his studies on pea plants into three main principles that define the fundamentals of inheritance in diploid species. They are the independent assortment principle, the dominance principle, and the principle of segregation.
Mendel's Findings
1. The hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
2. For each investigated characteristic, a gene pair from each parent is present in each cell. One allele for the dominant phenotype and one for the recessive phenotype are present in the F1 from a cross of two pure lines. The gene pair is made up of these two alleles.
3. Since just one of the gene pair's members segregates into each gamete, each gamete carries only that one gene.
4. Gametes mate randomly, regardless of the other gene pairs that are involved.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
What is the law of Independent Assortment and the law of segregation?
The Law of Independent Assortment in Genetics tends to state that the inheritance of the one pair of the genes is independent ofthe inheritance which is of another pair.
The Law of segregation tends to state that the every individual tends to possess the two alleles and here only one allele is said to be passed on to the offspring. Thus, this has to do with 1 gene and here the allocation of the gene copies is random.
Whereas, the Law of Independent Assortment in Genetics states that the allele of one gene tends to separate independently which is of an allele of the another gene. For instance, two-hybrid rabbits are crossed.
Hence, the law of Independent Assortment and the law of segregation in genetics were explained above.
To learn more about the Law of Segregation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1594166
#SPJ4
What happens when the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional ?
If a law is deemed unconstitutional, the courts can declare it unenforceable, and Congress can repeal the unconstitutional law to avoid confusion or include similar policies to try to achieve its goals.
A new version may choose to replace that law.
The Supreme Court has the power to conduct judicial review whenever Congress proposes new legislation.
During its review, the Supreme Court carefully considers each content of the proposed law. If any part of the content violates the rules laid down in the Constitution, those laws are considered "unconstitutional" and must be amended before they can pass.
To learn more about 'Supreme court', here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
What is Mendel's 1st and 2nd law?
Mendel's first law explains that two copies of alleles of a particular gene segregate into gametes while second law states during gamete formation, the alleles of each gene segregate from each other.
Law of dominance
According to the law of dominance, hybrid offspring inherit only phenotypic dominant traits. Suppressed alleles are called recessive traits, and alleles that determine traits are called dominant traits.
Law of segregation
The law of segregation states that during the production of gametes, her two copies of each genetic element are separated, so that offspring receive one her factor from each parent.
In other words, pairs of alleles (alternate forms of genes) segregate during gametogenesis and combine randomly during fertilization.
To learn more about 'Mendel's law', here:
https://brainly.com/question/23067535
#SPJ4
In a short paragraph, describe the requirements that both city firefighters and wild land firefighters must have
in order to pass the physical conditioning tests.
Firefighters are required to act safely, to look out for others, and to treat everyone equally. Additionally, they must to be aware that lives are at risk.
Describe firefighters.Firefighters are first responders and rescues with a focus on putting out flames. Their main duty is to put out dangerous flames that endanger people's lives, property, and the environment. They might also be necessary to protect animal lives in particular situations or jurisdictions.
The responsibilities of a fireman extend beyond putting out fires. One of the numerous things a fireman does is that. A firefighter assists with hazardous chemicals, traffic accidents, medical emergencies, floods, and even rescues cats from trees in addition to extinguishing fires and defending people from harm.
Sometimes, firefighters who are men known as "firemen" (and, less commonly, a female firefighter as firewoman).
To know more about firefighters visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28436633
#SPJ1
How does the use of the word official in this stage direction affect the mood of the scene sheriff?
Option c: the word “official” in this stage direction affect the mood of the scene that Sheriff is going to attempt to act professionally.
"Trifles" , a short play by Susan Glaspell.
The theme of the play is about sexism and oppression. Sheriffs and other men look down on women, saying that men worry about the really important things while they worry about the little things.
Clearly not an expert in His prejudices are already holding him back. However, he acts like he's doing "official business", so you could say he's at least trying to act professionally.
In the end, it is the woman who finds the evidence to explain the murder. But they don't tell men.
To learn more about ‘Trifles’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30131509
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Read the excerpt from part one of trifles. SHERIFF ( unbuttoning his overcoat and stepping away from the stove as if to the beginning of official business). How does the use of the word “official” in this stage direction affect the mood of the scene?
It suggests that the Sheriff is an honest man with great integrity.
It suggests that the Sheriff is pretending to know what he is doing.
It suggests that the Sheriff is going to attempt to act professionally.
It suggests that the Sheriff is very experienced with crimes of this sort.
Each of the 15 Executive Department are headed by a_______ except for the Department of Jutice, which i headed by the_______
Each agency is headed by a secretary from that department, with the exception of the Department of Justice, whose leader is known as the attorney general.
Every agency is headed by a secretary from that department, with the exception of the Department of Justice, which is led by the attorney general. The heads of the executive departments are chosen by the president; they formally accept their positions after being confirmed by the US Senate and serve at his or her pleasure. Usually acting as the president's advisory body, the US Cabinet is an executive body. The people who make up this group are the department leaders. In the Opinion Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the phrase "principal Officer in each of the executive Agencies" is used to describe the heads of executive departments. The heads of executive departments are in the order of succession to the president in the event of a vacancy in that position, following the vice president, the speaker of the House, and the president pro tempore of the Senate.
To know more about attorney general click on the below link:
brainly.com/question/29520955
#SPJ4
jeff is accused of shoplifting at a department store he is arrested goes to trial and is found not guilty the district attorney however after the trail is given new videotape evidence that jeff did in fact shoplift jeff is brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting
Answer:
This is known as double jeopardy. Double jeopardy is the prosecution of a person for the same crime more than once. The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution includes a prohibition against being "subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb," and most state constitutions have similar clauses.
Explanation:
In the scenario you've provided, Jeff has already been found not guilty of shoplifting in a trial. If he is then brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting, this would constitute double jeopardy and would be unconstitutional. However, there is an exception to this rule: if new evidence comes to light that was not available at the time of the first trial, and that evidence might reasonably have led to a different outcome, a person may be retried. But in such case it should be cleared that this new evidence is that substantial which would change the outcome of the trial, otherwise it will be considered as double jeopardy.